Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of LanDet model estimation errors with literature reports

From: Landet: an efficient physics-informed deep learning approach for automatic detection of anatomical landmarks and measurement of spinopelvic alignment

Measure

LanDet Model

Literature (Reported Mean Error and SD)

 

Mean error and SD

Upper range

Lower range

SS

\(3.7 \pm 2.7^\circ \)

\(8.4 \pm 6.3^\circ \)

\(2.7 \pm 2.9^\circ \)

\(R = 0.89\)

\(R = 0.76\)

\(R = 0.85\)

PT

\(1.3 \pm 1.1^\circ \)

\(2.7 \pm 2.5^\circ \)

\(1.2 \pm 1.7^\circ \)

\(R = 0.98\)

\(R = 0.9\)

\(R = 0.98\)

PI

\(4.2 \pm 3.1^\circ \)

\(9.5 \pm 7.1^\circ \)

\(3.8 \pm 2.0^\circ \)

\(R = 0.93\)

\(R = 0.72\)

\(R = 0.96\)

LL (L5-L1)

\(5.1 \pm 6.4^\circ \)

\(11.2 \pm 5.0^\circ \)

\(4.2 \pm 2.3^\circ \)

\(R = 0.83\)

\(R = 0.79\)

R = “not reported”

SVA

\(2.1 \pm 1.9\) mm

\(3.6 \pm 3.5\) mm

\(2.0 \pm 2.4\) mm

\(R = 0.98\)

\(R = 0.96\)

\(R = 0.99\)