Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality Assessment of the Studies Included in the Meta-Analysis

From: Efficacy and safety of the Latarjet procedure for the treatment of athletes with glenoid bone defects ≥ 20%: a single-arm meta-analysis

Study

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

Q7

Q8

Q9

Q10

Rossi 2022

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Brandariz 2021

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Ranalletta 2018

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Rossi 2018

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

Rossi 2020

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

  1. Numbers Q1-Q10 in heading signified: Q1, were there clear criteria for inclusion in the case series? Q2, was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants included in the case series? Q3, were valid methods used for identification of the condition for all participants included in the case series? Q4, did the case series have consecutive inclusion of participants? Q5, did the case series have complete inclusion of participants? Q6, was there clear reporting of the demographics of the participants in the study? Q7, was there clear reporting of clinical information of the participants? Q8, were the outcomes or follow-up results of cases clearly reported? Q9, was there clear reporting of the presenting site(s)/clinic(s) demographic information? Q10, was statistical analysis appropriate?Y: Yes, N: No