Skip to main content

Table 2 Study characteristics of arthroscopic transosseous repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex foveal tear

From: Effectiveness of suture anchor and transosseous suture technique in arthroscopic foveal repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex: a systematic review

References

Study design

Case number

Gender (F/M)

Age (years)

From injury to surgery (months)

Follow-up (months)

Outcome measurement

VAS

Function score

ROM

Grip

Complication (%)

Iwasaki et al. [36]

Case series

12

6:6

31

8

30

V

DASH

PS, FE

V

2 (16.7%)

Shinohara et al. [27]

Case series

11

4:7

27

9.7

30

 

MMWS

PS, FE

V

3 (27.3%)

Jegal et al. [37]

Case series

19

8:11

37

6

31

 

DASH, PRWE

 

V

9 (47.4%)

Abe et al. [38]

Case control

21

NA

34

8.5

34.4

V

PS, FE

 

V

0

Park et al. [28]

Case series

16

4:12

29.8

11

31.1

V

MMWS, Quick DASH

 

V

0

Park and Park [29]

Case series

10

4:6

33.4

8.5

23.5

V

MMWS, Quick DASH

 

V

0

Dunn et al. [30]

Case series

15

2:13

21.4

3.8

45.6

    

0

Jung et al. [31]

Case control

42

13:29

35.3

12.4

26.2

V

MMWS, DASH, PRWE

PS, FE

V

0

Park et al. [39]

Case control

80

24:56

27.8

10.5

24

V

MMWS, Quick DASH

 

V

6 (7.5%)

Hung et al. [15]

Case control

8

4:4

28.4

NA

6

V

FE

 

V

0

Liu et al. [43]

Case control

25

8:17

28

8

31

V

MMWS, DASH, PRWE

PS, FE

V

1 (4.0%)

Thalhammer et al. [42]

Case series

30

21:9

25

7

106

V

MMWS, DASH

  

5 (16.7%)

Afifi et al. [12]

RCT

30

15:15

30.2

5.6

24

V

MMWS, Quick DASH, PRWE

 

V

6 (20.0%)

Gvozdenovic and Simonsen [33]

Case series

44

20:24

32

23

31

V

Quick DASH

PS, FE

V

0

Jung et al. [32]

Case control

40

12:28

34.9

7.6

25

V

MMWS, DASH, PRWE

 

V

0

Park et al. [40]

Case series

17

5:12

40

8

28.6

V

MMWS, DASH, PRWE

PS, FE

V

0

Yang and Chen [19]

Case series

12

5:7

32

5

53

 

MMWS, DASH

  

0

Nam et al. [45]

Case control

66

11:55

24.7

14.4

26.9

V

MMWS, Quick DASH

 

V

0

Shinohara et al. [44]

Case series

20

11:9

36

NA

17

 

MMWS

PS, FE

V

2 (10.0%)

  1. F female, M male, VAS visual analogue scale, ROM range of motion, PS pronation–supination, FE flexion–extension, NR not recorded, RCT randomized controlled trial, MMWS modified Mayo wrist score, DASH disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand, PRWE patient-rated wrist evaluation