Table 2 Patients who received modular stem or conical stem to reconstruct femoral side
Case number | Reason for THA | TYPE OF STEM | Preoperative Mako-measured femoral version | Postoperative CT-measured femoral version |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DDH | Wagner cone | 11 | 20.67 |
2 | DDH | S-ROM | 32 | 26.47 |
3 | OA | Wagner cone | − 4 | 29.68 |
4 | DDH | Wagner cone | 28 | 22.70 |
5 | DDH | Wagner cone | 28 | 21.32 |
6 | DDH | Wagner cone | 27 | 16.22 |
7 | AVN | Wagner cone | 45 | 24.86 |
8 | DDH | Wagner cone | − 32 | 8.88 |
9 | AVN | Wagner cone | 19 | Without CT |
10 | DDH | Wagner cone | 21 | Without CT |
11 | AVN | Wagner cone | 38 | Without CT |