Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of imaging indexes between the ACDF and LP groups

From: Comparison of anterior cervical diskectomy with fusion (ACDF) and laminoplasty treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with developmental canal stenosis: a retrospective study

Comparative indicators

ACDF

LP

P

C2–C7 Cobb angle (°)

 Preoperative

15.95 ± 8.51

14.86 ± 8.60

0.688

 Final follow-up

21.85 ± 9.94

15.14 ± 8.65

0.025

 P

0.038

0.778

 

SVA (mm)

 Preoperative

14.51 ± 8.47

18.31 ± 9.65

0.191

 Final follow-up

18.94 ± 12.56

22.34 ± 15.00

0.443

 P

0.118

0.548

 

T1 slope (°)

 Preoperative

23.00 ± 7 .23

25.95 ± 7.54

0.210

 Final follow-up

27.00 ± 5.93

23.86 ± 7.39

0.146

 P

0.026

0.093

 

cROM (°)

 Preoperative

43.16 ± 8.86

45.55 ± 10.53

0.380

 Final follow-up

18.47 ± 6.10

40.55 ± 8.87

 < 0.001

 P

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 
  1. ACDF, Anterior cervical diskectomy with fusion; LP, Laminoplasty; SVA, C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis; cROM, Cervical range of motion; and P, P value
  2. ” means P < 0.05, which is statistically significant