Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of patients with and without PPIF following osteosynthesis for femoral pertrochanteric fracture with INTERTAN™

From: Perioperative peri-implant fracture after osteosynthesis for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fracture with the linear compression integrated screw intramedullary nail system (INTERTAN™): a retrospective study

 

PPIF (12)

NPPIF (86)

p value

Age (mean + SD)

77.7 (SD 9.7)

74.4 (SD 15.6)

0.488

Sex

  

0.069

Male

2 (16.7%)

38 (44.2%)

 

Female

10 (83.3%)

48 (55.8%)

 

BMI (mean + SD)

27.3 (SD 6.1)

23.2 (SD 4.2)

0.005

OTA classificationa

  

0.646

A1

0

10 (11.6%)

 

A2

12 (100%)

61 (71.0%)

 

A3

0

15 (17.4%)

 

Quality of reduction

According to neck-shaft angle

  

0.362

Good

9 (75.0%)

52 (60.5%)

 

Acceptable

3 (25.0%)

22 (25.6%)

 

Poor

0

12 (14.0%)

 

According to medial cortical support

  

0.103

 

2 (16.7%)

7 (8.1%)

 

Negative

8 (66.6%)

37 (43.0%)

 

Neutral

2 (16.7%)

42 (48.8%)

 

Positive

   

Quality of fixation

TAD (mm)

17.2 (SD 5.8)

21.5 (SD 5.6)

0.126

Cleveland index

  

0.182

1/2/3

1/2/2

6 /33/0

 

4/5/6

0/7/0

2 /41/2

 

7/8/9

0/0/0

0/2/0

 

Nail length

  

0.334

Short nail

2 (16.7%)

28 (32.6%)

 

Long nail

10 (83.3%)

58 (67.4%)

 

MoF

Lesser trochanter width (mm)

28.0 (SD 2.7)

30.8 (SD4.1)

0.026

Low-lesser trochanter width (mm)

18.7 (SD 2.6)

23.2 (SD3.0)

0.001

Diameter of isthmus (mm)

12.1 (SD1.2)

14.4 (SD2.5)

0.002

Canal flare index

2.4 (SD0.4)

2.3 (SD1.0)

0.693

  1. BMI Body mass index, TAD Tip-apex distance, MoF Morphology of femur, NPPIF Non-perioperative peri-implant fracture, PPIF Perioperative peri-implant fracture
  2. aBased on the Arbeitsgemeinschaf für Osteosynthesefragen (AO/OTA) classification (2018 revision)