Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of each included study by the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS)

From: Association of hardware removal with secondary osteonecrosis following femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Selection

Comparability

Outcome measurement

Statistical analysis

Total score

Patient definitiona

Representativeness of patientsb

Selection of controlsc

Definition of controlsd

Control for important factore

Reliability of outcome measuref

Validity of outcome measureg

Sample sizeh

Statistical methodi

Ai et al. [2]

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

8

Chang et al. [13]

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

7

Pei et al. [9]

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

8

Wang C et al. [10]

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

9

Wang T et al. [5]

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

8

  1. aThe inclusion/exclusion criteria are clearly defined
  2. bHow were cases selected? (e.g., random sample)
  3. cControls were derived from the same community as patients
  4. dControls defined as individuals without avascular necrosis of the femoral head
  5. eConfounding factors have been well adjusted
  6. fThe measure of avascular necrosis of the femoral head has documented reliability
  7. gThe measure of avascular necrosis of the femoral head has documented validity
  8. hThe sample size was justifed
  9. iThe statistical analysis was clearly presented and was appropriate