Skip to main content

Table 3 Pearson’s correlation analysis of the correlation between BMD changes and other factors

From: Evaluation of bone mineral density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a three-dimensional finite element model: a retrospective study

Factors

Bilateral sides

Concave sides

Convex sides

Apical vertebra

Main curve range (U/L-EV)

Mean age

r = 0.123, p = 0.540

r = 0.118, p = 0.559

r = 0.129, p = 0.520

r =  − 0.490, p = 0.009

r = 0.317, p = 0.107

Mean height

r = 0.097, p = 0.631

r = 0.044, p = 0.828

r = 0.147, p = 0.464

r =  − 0.478, p = 0.042

r = 0.000, p = 0.999

Mean weight

r = 0.092, p = 0.648

r = 0.025, p = 0.903

r = 0.158, p = 0.430

r = 0.374, p = 0.055

r = 0.030, p = 0.882

BMI

r = 0.020, p = 0.922

r = 0.027, p = 0.894

r = 0.069, p = 0.733

r = 0.167, p = 0.405

r = 0.055, p = 0.787

Risser sign

r = 0.081, p = 0.688

r = 0.074, p = 0.714

r = 0.094, p = 0.641

r = 0.037, p = 0.856

r = 0.058, p = 0.775

Main Cobb angle

r = 0.020, p = 0.921

r = 0.061, p = 0.758

r = 0.035, p = 0.860

r = 0.436, p = 0.020

r = 0.190, p = 0.333

Kyphosis angle

r = 0.033, p = 0.866

r = 0.140, p = 0.477

r = 0.079, p = 0.690

r = 0.465, p = 0.013

r = 0.230, p = 0.239

AVT

r = 0.092, p = 0.640

r = 0.040, p = 0.842

r = 0.142, p = 0.472

r = 0.236, p = 0.226

r = 0.017, p = 0.930

Coronal balance

r = 0.093, p = 0.636

r = 0.061, p = 0.758

r = 0.126, p = 0.523

r = 0.263, p = 0.176

r = 0.017, p = 0.932

  1. Bold value indicates significance threshold was set at 5% (p < 0.05)
  2. BMD: bone mineral density; BMI: body mass index; AVT: apical vertebral translation