Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparisons of the proportion of patients achieving MCID in VAS and ODI scores between traditional puncture PVP and extra-facet puncture PVP (n = 217)

From: Optimizing percutaneous vertebroplasty: extra-facet puncture for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

 

VAS

ODI

t-PVP (n = 112)

ef-PVP (n = 105)

p

t-PVP (n = 112)

ef-PVP (n = 105)

p

1 day after surgery

82 (73.21%)

94 (89.52%)

0.003F

89 (79.46%)

98 (93.33%)

0.003F

1 week after surgery

87 (77.68%)

96 (91.43%)

0.008F

101 (90.18%)

104 (99.05%)

0.005F

1 month after surgery

101 (90.18%)

100 (95.24%)

0.197F

112 (100%)

105 (100%)

–

3 months after surgery

111 (99.11%)

105 (100%)

 > 0.999F

112 (100%)

105 (100%)

–

1 year after surgery

111 (99.11%)

105 (100%)

 > 0.999F

112 (100%)

105 (100%)

–

  1. The symbol ‘U’ indicates the data was analyzed by the unpaired Mann–Whitney U test; The symbol ‘T’ indicates the data was analyzed by the unpaired t test
  2. The symbol ‘F’ indicates the data was analyzed by the Fisher’s exact test
  3. MCID minimal clinically important difference, t-PVP Traditional puncture percutaneous vertebroplasty, ef-PVP Extra-facet puncture percutaneous vertebroplasty
Back to article page

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X