Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinical comparison between two groups

From: Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy and conventional open lumbar discectomy for L4/5 and L5/S1 double-segmental lumbar disk herniation

 

PEID

COLD

t or X2 value

P value

VAS back

    

 Preoperative

5.36 ± 1.25

5.04 ± 1.27

0.895

0.375

 1 day

2.52 ± 1.12*

2.72 ± 0.84*

 − 0.712

0.480

 3 months

2.04 ± 0.98*

2.32 ± 0.80*

 − 1.107

0.274

 Final follow-up

0.84 ± 0.55*

1.12 ± 0.60*

 − 1.715

0.093

VAS leg

    

 Preoperative

7.68 ± 1.07

7.80 ± 1.26

 − 0.363

0.718

 1 day

3.28 ± 0.98*

3.12 ± 0.88*

0.607

0.547

 3 months

2.24 ± 0.97*

2.32 ± 0.80*

 − 0.318

0.752

 Final follow-up

0.92 ± 0.40*

1.04 ± 0.61*

 − 0.822

0.425

ODI

    

 Preoperative

57.16 ± 11.40

56.40 ± 12.80

0.449

0.655

 1 day

24.96 ± 4.13*

26.10 ± 5.77*

 − 1.014

0.315

 3 months

17.68 ± 4.27*

17.28 ± 4.90*

0.308

0.759

 Final follow-up

10.48v3.23*

12.16 ± 3.60*

 − 1.736

0.089

MacNab evaluation

    

 Excellence

19

17

  

 Good

4

5

  

 Fair

1

2

  

 Poor

1

1

  

 Excellence/good rate

23/25

22/25

0.200

0.655

  1. VAS Visual analog scale; ODI Oswestry disability index
  2. *Statistically significant compare with the preoperative, P < 0.05