Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of soft tissue incarceration /non- soft tissue incarceration group

From: Docking site complications analysis of Ilizarov bone transport technique in the treatment of tibial bone defects

Demographic date

Soft tissue incarceration

Non-soft tissue incarceration

t/\({x}^{2}\)

P

Sex

Male

9 (10.00)

81 (90.00)

0.069

0.793

Female

1 (7.69)

12 (92.31)

Type of external fixation

Monolateral

9 (97.83)

83 (2.17)

0.005

0.942

Circular

1 (9.09)

10 (90.91)

Soft tissue defect

Yes

5 (29.41)

12 (70.59)

9.017

0.003

No

5 (5.81)

81 (94.19)

Level of bone transport

Single

9 (11.25)

71 (88.75)

0.971

0.324

Double

1 (4.35)

22 (95.65)

Location of bone defect

Proximal 1/3

1 (5.26)

18 (94.74)

0.543

0.762

Middle 1/3

4 (10.26)

35 (89.74)

Distal 1/3

5 (11.11)

40 (88.89)

Age

37.90 ± 13.89

37.72 ± 13.62

 − 0.032

0.974

Previous operation time

5.50 ± 1.27

3.44 ± 1.00

 − 6.000

 < 0.001

Size of bone defect

7.75 ± 2.66

6.43 ± 2.08

 − 1.854

0.067

DT

77.90 ± 11.58

71.70 ± 13.23

 − 1.423

0.158

EFT

339.70 ± 69.97

288.31 ± 54.19

 − 2.768

0.007

EFI

60.98 ± 12.88

52.51 ± 8.78

 − 2.030

0.07