Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline of clinical variables among the sport level-reduced, unchanged and improved groups

From: Muti-factor analysis of sport activity level after high tibial osteotomy

Characteristics

Total (n = 158)

Sport level-reduced group (n = 28, 17.7%)

Sport level-unchanged group (n = 97, 61.4%)

Sport level-improved group (n = 33, 20.9%)

P value

Age, yr

55.27 ± 6.1

56.18 ± 6.7

55.51 ± 6.4

53.82 ± 4.4

0.269

Sex, n (%)

    

0.436

Male

33(20.9%)

8(28.6%)

20 (20.6%)

5(15.2%)

 

Female

125(79.1%)

20(71.4%)

77(79.4%)

28(84.8%)

 

BMI, kg/m2

27.60 ± 3.9

28.20 ± 6.5

27.51 ± 3.1

27.31 ± 3.34

0.641

Side, n (%)

    

0.858

Left

84(53.2%)

16(57.1%)

50(51.5%)

18(54.5%)

 

Right

74(45.8%)

12(42.9%)

47(48.5%)

15(45.5%)

 

SAL pre, n (%)

    

 < 0.001

Low

102(64.6%)

6(21.4%)

64(66.0%)

32(97.0%)

 

Middle

34(21.5%)

12(42.9%)

21(21.6%)

1(3.0%)

 

High

22(13.9%)

10(35.7%)

12(12.4%)

0(0%)

 

Lysholm pre

58.30 ± 17.5

60.11 ± 18.2

61.65 ± 16.8

46.94 ± 14.0

 < 0.001

CMT, n (%)

    

0.275

YES

93(58.9%)

20(71.4%)

53(54.6%)

20(60.6%)

 

NO

65(41.1%)

8(28.6%)

44(45.4%)

13(39.4%)

 

Preoperative desire level for RTS, n (%)

    

0.794

Low

15(9.5%)

1(3.6%)

14(14.4%)

0(9.5%)

 

Medium

14(8.9%)

1(3.6%)

8(8.2%)

5(15.2%)

 

High

52(32.9%)

10(35.7%)

35(36.1%)

7(21.2%)

 

Extremely high

77(48.7%)

16(57.1%)

40(41.2%)

21(63.6%)

 

Breadwinner, n (%)

    

0.916

Yes

47(29.7%)

8(28.6%)

30(30.9%)

9(29.7%)

 

No

111(70.3%)

20(71.4%)

67(69.1%)

24(72.7%)

 
  1. Continuous variables were described as mean ± standard and categorical variables as frequencies with percentage (%). BMI Body mass index, SAL Sport activity level, Lysholm Lysholm knee score, CMT Concomitant meniscal treatment, RTS Return to sport