Skip to main content

Table 2 Differences between functional scores classes

From: Clinical versus radiological method for adjusting rotational alignment during femoral shaft fractures intramedullary nailing and the malrotation impact on the functional outcomes: early results from a prospective cohort study

 

Group I (n = 17)

Group II (n = 16)

p value

Harris hip score

Mean ± SD

89.4 ± 7.4

87.7 ± 8.9

0.54

Class

  

0.69

 Excellent

9 (52.9%)

6 (37.5%)

 Good

7 (41.2%)

7 (43.8%)

 Fair

1 (5.9%)

2 (12.5%)

 Poor

0

1 (6.3%)

Lysholm knee score

Mean ± SD

84.6 ± 9.6

80.4 ± 13.9

0.32

Class

  

0.55

 Excellent

5 (29.4%)

4 (25%)

 Good

9 (52.9%)

5 (31.3%)

 Fair

3 (17.6%)

4 (25%)

 Poor

0

3 (18.8%)

Neer score

Mean ± SD

87.9 ± 9.5

83 ± 12.5

0.21

Class

  

0.29

 Excellent

12 (70.6%)

6 (37.5%)

 Satisfactory

4 (23.5%)

8 (50%)

 Unsatisfactory

1 (5.9%)

2 (12.5%)

  1. Group I (accepted rotation), Group II (true malrotation)