Table 2 Studies comparing planned and achieved positioning of custom-made with CT scans
From: Custom-made implants for massive acetabular bone loss: accuracy with CT assessment
References | No of patients | CoR shift | ∆Inclination | ∆Anteversion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
∆Cranial shift | ∆Posterior shift | ∆Lateral shift | ||||
Baauw et al. [21] | 16 | + 3.2 mm (− 1/+ 17.9) | + 0.6 mm (− 1.8/+ 7) | + 1.3 mm (− 1.3/+ 5) | + 3° (− 2/17) | − 4.1° (− 16/+ 5) |
Weber et al. [22] | 11 | + 0.4 mm (− 5/+ 5.2) | + 1.1 mm (− 6.5/+ 5) | + 0.3 mm (− 5/+ 7.5) | 3.6° (− 2/+ 7.5) | − 1.2° (− 9.5/+ 15.5) |
Durand-Hill et al. [23] | 20 | + 0.4 mm (− 6/+ 19) | + 0.2 mm (− 7/+ 9) | + 0.45 mm (− 10/+ 10) | 0.75° (− 11/12) | + 2° (− 13/19) |
Zampelis and Fivlik [24] | 10 | 1.1 mm (IQR − 1.6/+ 2.8) | 0.5 mm (IQR − 0.7/+ 2.9) | 0.6 mm (IQR + 0.1/+ 1.8) | 3.6° (− 10.7/+ 11.2) | − 2.8° (− 12/+ 5.7) |