Skip to main content

Table 2 Integrated data for individual studies by site of pathology

From: Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT for bone marrow edema in patients with acute knee injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Published year

Site of pathology

No. total regions

No. marrow edema

TP

FP

FN

TN

Threshold value*

Ai

2014

Knee

56

36

22

0

14

20

Qualitative

Bjorkman

2019

Knee–Femur

95

43

26

11

17

41

Qualitative

  

Knee–Tibia

96

41

26

14

15

41

Qualitative

Booz

2020

Knee–Femur

342

91

85

11

6

240

Qualitative

  

Knee–Tibia

342

106

100

11

6

225

Qualitative

  

Knee–Femur

342

91

86

12

5

239

 − 42 hu

  

Knee–Tibia

342

106

102

7

4

229

 − 51 hu

Cao

2015

Knee–Femur

192

49

36

2

13

141

Qualitative

  

Knee–Tibia

192

67

61

0

6

125

Qualitative

Foti

2021

Knee

396

85

77

20

8

291

Qualitative

  

Knee

396

85

72

20

13

291

 − 15 hu

Juhng

2013

Knee–Femur

162

29

17

7

12

126

Qualitative

  

Knee–Tibia

162

44

33

3

11

116

Qualitative

  

Knee–Femur + Tibia + Patella

378

84

54

9

30

285

 

Liang

2020

Knee

288

121

99

9

22

158

Qualitative

Pache

2010

Knee–Femur

114

19

15

2

4

93

 − 33 hu

  

Knee–Tibia

122

40

38

7

2

75

 − 60 HU

Wang

2019

Knee

195

43

38

3

5

149

 − 67 HU

  1. No.—number; TP—true positive; FP—false positive; FN—false negative; TN—true negative; HU—Hounsfield unit
  2. *Threshold value for quantitative studies determined as a region of interest measuring a circumference of at least 3 mm and placed at least 1 mm from the cortical margin