Table 2 Comparison of clinical and functional outcomes of various treatment studies
Study | Number of patients, n | Location, n | Methods of reconstruction, n | Follow-up, (months) | Local recurrence | Complications, n | Function, (MSTS score) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current study | 7 | P I, (3); P II, (4) | 3D-printed personalized implant | 35.3 | No | Delayed wound healing, (1) | 24 |
Guo et al. [13] | 14 | P II, (14) | Recycled tumor bone, (3); Modular pelvic prosthesis, (11) | 45 | No | Delayed infection, (1) Bone nonunion, (1) Dislocation, (1) Wound healing disturbance, (4) | 22 |
Zheng et al. [26] | 21 | P I, (8); P II, (7); P III, (6) | Without reconstruction, (13); Rod fixation and total hip arthroplasty; (5) Pelvic ring reconstruction; (3) | 42 | 2/21 | Delayed infection, (1) Dislocation, (1) Wound healing problem, (4) | 22 |
Xiao et al. [14] | 7 | P II, (7) | Autogenous femoral head bone grafts, (7) | 38.1 | 1/7 | No | 29 |
Verma et al. [7] | 1 | P I, (1) | 3D-printed personalized implant | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Khal et al. [24] | 1 | P II, (1) | 3D-printed personalized implant | 24 | No | No | 28 |