Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of intervention effects of each intervention measure

From: The effect of an exercise intervention on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a network meta-analysis

Conventional therapy

 − 3.82 ( − 4.74, − 2.90)

 − 3.79 ( − 4.51, − 3.07)

 − 4.60 ( − 8.08, − 1.11)

 − 3.63 ( − 5.06, − 2.19)

 − 3.30 ( − 4.19, − 2.41)

3.82 (2.90,4.74)

Core strength training

0.03 ( − 1.02,1.08)

 − 0.78 ( − 4.38,2.83)

0.19 ( − 1.38,1.77)

0.52 ( − 0.76,1.81)

3.79 (3.07,4.51)

 − 0.03 ( − 1.08,1.02)

PSSE

 − 0.81 ( − 4.37,2.75)

0.16 ( − 1.42,1.75)

0.49 ( − 0.66,1.64)

4.60 (1.11,8.08)

0.78 ( − 2.83,4.38)

0.81 ( − 2.75,4.37)

Yoga

0.97 ( − 2.80,4.74)

1.30 ( − 2.30,4.90)

3.63 (2.19,5.06)

 − 0.19 ( − 1.77,1.38)

 − 0.16 ( − 1.75,1.42)

 − 0.97 ( − 4.74,2.80)

Schroth exercise

0.33 ( − 1.36,2.02)

3.30 (2.41,4.19)

 − 0.52 ( − 1.81,0.76)

 − 0.49 ( − 1.64,0.66)

 − 1.30 ( − 4.90,2.30)

 − 0.33 ( − 2.02,1.36)

Sling exercise

  1. Posterior means 95% Bayesian credible intervals are calculated by column–row under the fixed effects model assuming consistency.Mean difference < 0 favors the intervention in the column; mean difference > 0 favors the intervention in the row