Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies (N = 26)

From: Diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for periprosthetic joint infection of hip: systematic review and meta-analysis

Serial no

References

Country

Prospective/retrospective

Total sample

Contrast agent used for PET/CT

Gold standard for diagnosis

Mean age (in years)

Risk of bias

1

Aksoy et al. [24]

Turkey

Prospective

16

FDG

Postoperative histopathological/microbiological/clinical work-up

61

Low risk

2

Aleksyniene et al. [31]

Denmark

Prospective

25

FDG

Intraoperative findings and microbiological culture results and the clinical follow-up

Not reported

Low risk

3

Basu et al. [8]

USA

Prospective

134

FDG

Microbiological confirmation using cultures/purulent fluid and presence of neutrophilic infiltrate

57

Low risk

4

Chacko et al. [29]

USA

Prospective

41

FDG

Microbiology, histopathology, surgical and clinical follow-up

61.9

Low risk

5

Chen et al. [16]

Taiwan

Prospective

24

FDG

Intraoperative tissue cultures, intraoperative pathology, and clinical follow-up

Not reported

Low risk

6

Chryssikos et al. [24]

USA

Prospective

127

FDG

Preoperative examinations, intraoperative histopathology and clinical findings

59

Low risk

7

Garcia-Barrecheguren et al. [10]

Spain

Prospective

24

FDG

Intraoperative results, histopathological and microbiological examinations

67.8

Low risk

8

Kiran et al. [20]

United Kingdom

Prospective

130

FDG

Histopathology and microbiological examinations

67.5

Low risk

9

Kobayashi et al. [35]

Japan

Prospective

65

Fluoride

Tissue examinations of surgically treated cases, serological and radiographic findings in conservatively treated cases

Not reported

Low risk

10

Kumar et al. [14]

India

Prospective

45

Fluoride

Intraoperative results, histopathological and microbiological examinations

54

Low risk

11

Kumar et al. [14]

India

Prospective

42

FDG

Intraoperative results, histopathological and microbiological examinations

53

Low risk

12

Kwee et al. [9]

Netherlands

Retrospective

78

FDG

Culture findings during the revision surgery

66.5

High risk

13

Love et al. [18]

USA

Retrospective

59

FDG

Intraoperative results, histopathological and microbiological examinations

Not reported

High risk

14

Manthey et al. [32]

Germany

Prospective

23

FDG

Culture findings following surgery

70

Low risk

15

Mayer-Wagner et al. [34]

Germany

Prospective

49

FDG

Culture findings following surgery

Not reported

Low risk

16

Mumme et al. [21]

Germany

Prospective

70

FDG

Intraoperative results, histopathological and microbiological examinations

68.7

Low risk

17

Pill et al. [15]

USA

Prospective

92

FDG

Clinical examination findings and preoperative, intraoperative findings

Not reported

Low risk

18

Reinartz et al. [28]

Germany

Prospective

92

Fluoride

Laboratory tests, radiological and clinical examination

68

Low risk

19

Stumpe et al. [23]

Switzerland

Prospective

35

FDG

Microbiological examination of the surgical specimens

64

Low risk

20

Teiler et al. [17]

Sweden

Prospective

10

FDG

Histopathological examinations

Not reported

Low risk

21

Tseng et al. [27]

Taiwan

Prospective

19

FDG

Intraoperative findings and microbiological analysis

64

Low risk

22

Vanquickenborne et al. [33]

Belgium

Prospective

17

FDG

Bacteriology of samples obtained by surgery or by needle aspiration and/or clinical findings

62

Low risk

23

Verberne et al. [28]

The Netherlands

Retrospective

33

FDG

Clinical examination findings and preoperative, intraoperative findings

76.4

High risk

24

Wang et al. [19]

China

Retrospective

103

Gallium

Preoperative and intraoperative serological results

61

High risk

25

Xu et al. [13]

China

Prospective

39

Gallium

Clinical, intraoperative results, histopathological and microbiological examinations

61.9

Low risk

26

Zhuang et al. [30]

USA

Prospective

38

FDG

Surgical exploration/clinical follow-up for one year

Not reported

High risk

  1. FDG 18Fluorodeoxyglucose, PET/CT Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography, PJI Prosthetic Joint Infection