Skip to main content

Table 1 The detailed parameters of the included studies

From: Methods to predict osteonecrosis of femoral head after femoral neck fracture: a systematic review of the literature

Study No

Author

Year

cases

Mean age (years)

Female/Male

Follow-up (months)

Study design

Level

Method to predict ONFH after FNF

Radiographic imaging

1

Jian Xiao et al.

2012

9

44.6

6/3

NR

Prospective

IV

Superselective angiography

2

Yang Liu et al.

2013

45

45.4

19/26

6–60

Prospective

IV

Superselective angiography

3

J. W. Kim et al.

2007

83

67.0

62/21

NR

Retrospective

IV

Bone scintigraphy

4

Ashishkumar K et al.

2018

22

11.2

7/13

NR

Retrospective

IV

Bone scintigraphy

5

Jan Juréus et al.

2016

8

11.5

4/4

 > 12

Retrospective

IV

Bone scintigraphy

6

Ji Wan Kim et al.

2017

44

66.9

33/11

24–73

Retrospective cohort

IV

Bone SPECT

7

B. Iqbal et al.

2022

279

NR

NR

NR

Meta-analysis

I

Bone SPECT/CT

8

Sung Jun Park et al.

2019

97

75.4

NR

12–56

Retrospective

IV

Bone SPECT/CT

9

Jae Youn Yoon et al.

2020

30

64.3

19/11

24–106.8

Prospective cohort

III

Bone SPECT/CT

10

Sangwon Han et al.

2017

53

59.1

39/14

12

Retrospective

IV

Bone SPECT/CT

11

Yeon-Hee Han et al.

2019

131

78.0

82/49

NR

Retrospective

IV

Bone SPECT/CT

12

Yoo Sung Song et al.

2022

21

11.0

10/11

 > 12

Retrospective

IV

Bone SPECT/CT

13

Heng-feng Yuan et al.

2015

114

58.6

61/53

24

Prospective

III

Bone SPECT/CT

14

Jong Ho Noh et al.

2020

72

54.01

50/22

6–187

Retrospective

IV

Bone SPECT/CT

15

Abhishek Kaushik et al.

2010

31

47

15/15

NR

Prospective

III

Dynamic enhanced MRI

16

Masatoshi Morimoto et al.

2017

64

78

54/14

 > 24

Prospective

III

Dynamic enhanced MRI

17

Philipp Lang et al.

1993

20

NR

NR

 > 12

Prospective

IV

Dynamic enhanced MRI

18

T. Schneider et al.

2003

30

NR

NR

NR

Prospective

IV

Dynamic enhanced MRI

19

Abhishek Kaushik et al.

2009

31

48

NR

 > 6

Prospective

III

Dynamic enhanced MRI

20

Scott N. Nadel et al.

1992

5

NR

NR

NR

Prospective

IV

Dynamic enhanced MRI

21

Dewei Zhao et al.

2017

27

NR

NR

NR

Prospective

IV

Micro-CT

22

Xing Qiu et al.

2016

14

37.2

1/13

NR

NR

IV

Micro-CT

23

Xing Qiu et al.

2018

12

69.5

10/2

NR

Prospective

IV

Micro-CT

Artificial intelligence

24

Huan Wang et al.

2021

259

57

135/124

30

Retrospective

IV

Prediction model

25

Wanbo Zhu et al.

2020

238

 > 46.4

106/132

 > 60

Retrospective

IV

Prediction model

26

Shuangshuang Cui et al.

2018

120

55

71/49

16–83

Ambispective cohort

III

Prediction model

27

Jiaqi Zheng et al.

2021

378

56

219/159

 > 36

Retrospective

IV

Prediction model

Intraoperative methods

28

Gill Thomas J et al.

1998

64

81

34/30

38.4

Prospective

III

Femoral head drilling

29

Jozsef Nyarady et al.

2012

9

NR

NR

29

Prospective

IV

Osteoscopy

30

Yoshinobu Watanabe et al.

2007

18

76.5

13/4

19

Prospective

III

Intramedullary oxygen tension

31

M F Swiontkowski et al.

1987

5

NR

NR

12

Prospective

IV

Doppler-laser flowmetry

32

K Sugamoto et al.

1998

28

NR

NR

NR

Prospective

IV

Doppler-laser flowmetry

33

H P Nötzli et al.

2002

32

NR

NR

NR

Prospective

IV

Doppler-laser flowmetry

34

Myung-Rae Cho et al.

2007

54

51

31/23

25–57

Retrospective

IV

Bleeding from the holes of proximal cannulated screws

35

Tim Schrader et al.

2016

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

V

Intraosseous pressure

36

Jeffrey Donahue et al.

2021

20

56

11/8

12

Prospective

II

Intraosseous pressure

  1. NR Not record