Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies in network meta-analysis

From: Comparison of clinical efficacy and surgical safety among three bone graft modalities in spinal tuberculosis: a network meta-analysis

Study ID

Study design

Level of TB

Group

Sex (M/F)

Age (years)

Sample sizes

Follow-up (months)

Results

He et al. [7]

RS

Thoracic

AM

12/16

46.32 ± 14.07

28

24

   

TM

11/15

49.97 ± 16.36

36

  

Gao et al. [5]

RS

Thoracic and lumbar

AM

9/16

41.4 ± 14.3

25

35.5

   

TM

13/12

39.2 ± 14.2

25

  

Yin et al. [15]

RS

Lumbar

AM

11/8

55.5 ± 12.6

19

47.3 ± 8.1

   

TM

10/7

49.9 ± 15.4

17

  

Wu et al. [9]

RS

Thoracic and lumbar

AM

33/27

48.0 ± 16.5

60

60

   

TM

55/31

53.1 ± 18.8

86

  

Liu et al. [13]

RS

Lumbar

AG

11/11

43.9 ± 12.1

22

21.6 ± 5.7

   

AM

19/17

40.5 ± 16.5

36

22.3 ± 6.2

 

Xu et al. [8]

RS

Lumbar

AG

23/20

47.4 ± 12.4

43

28.7 ± 4.3

   

AM

22/17

48.2 ± 12.0

39

  

Xu et al. [14]

RS

Lumbar

AM

24/17

47.6 ± 13.3

41

76.5 ± 11.2

   

TM

24/16

49.4 ± 12.3

40

  
  1. TB tuberculosis, RS retrospective cohort study, QAS quality assessment score, AM autogenous massive bone graft, AG autogenous granular bone graft, TM titanium mesh bone graft, CRP, ESR, VAS, blood loss, operation time, complications, loss of Cobb angle, bone graft fusion time