Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of subjectively perceived LLD after THA

From: The influence of prosthetic positioning and proximal femoral morphology on leg length discrepancy and early clinical outcomes of cementless total hip arthroplasty

 

Subjectively perceived LLD-positive

Subjectively perceived LLD-negative

Univariate p value

Multivariate

Exp(B)

95% CI

p value

Age (year)

61.23 ± 9.84

60.63 ± 10.62

0.745

   

BMI (kg/m2)

25.47 ± 3.80

25.65 ± 3.10

0.762

   

Gender (number, %)

0.172

0.56

0.27, 1.19

0.132

Male

25, 56.82%

80, 68.38%

    

Female

19, 43.18%

37, 31.62%

    

Side (number, %)

0.450

   

Left hip

20, 45.45%

61, 52.14%

    

Right hip

24, 54.55%

56, 47.86%

    

Stem

0.142

1.66

0.80, 3.46

0.177

Fully coated

23, 52.27%

76, 64.96%

    

Proximally coated

21, 47.73%

41, 35.04%

    

CFR (%)

2 cm above the LT tip (A1)

61.54 ± 5.27

61.88 ± 6.39

0.754

   

LT tip (L)

79.84 ± 6.91

79.03 ± 7.84

0.541

   

2 cm below the LT tip (B1)

81.77 ± 6.00

82.75 ± 6.39

0.375

   

7 cm below the LT tip (B2)

75.38 ± 11.52

74.49 ± 9.62

0.620

   

CFI

4.12 ± 0.96

3.75 ± 0.66

0.008

1.82

1.14, 2.91

0.013

Postoperative ΔHCOR (mm)

− 1.69 ± 3.30

− 2.45 ± 3.84

0.246

   

Postoperative ΔVCOR (mm)

1.45 ± 4.22

2.17 ± 3.24

0.252

   

Postoperative ΔFO (mm)

0.38 ± 8.12

− 0.18 ± 6.75

0.658

  Â