Skip to main content

Table 3 The results were summarized in the meta-analysis of ADAM12 gene polymorphisms in association with knee osteoarthritis risk

From: The association between ADAM12 gene polymorphisms and osteoarthritis: an updated meta-analysis

Subgroup

Genetic model

Sample size

Test of association

Test of heterogeneity

Test of publication bias (Begg’s test)

Test of publication bias (Egger’s test)

Case/control

OR

95% CI (P-value)

I2 (%)

P

Z

P

T

P

Rs3740199

Overall

Dominant model

1686/2845

0.98

0.86–1.13 (0.798)

0

0.585

0.87

0.386

− 0.75

0.479

Recessive model

1686/2845

1.02

0.88–1.18 (0.778)

43.0

0.092

0.12

0.902

0.05

0.960

Allelic model

2467/4030

0.98

0.91–1.05 (0.567)

28.4

0.174

0.16

0.876

− 0.21

0.841

CC versus GG

1686/2845

1.01

0.85–1.21 (0.884)

22.8

0.248

0.87

0.386

− 0.32

0.761

GC versus GG

1686/2845

0.97

0.84–1.12 (0.664)

0

0.535

0.87

0.386

− 0.86

0.424

Subgroup

          

 European

Dominant model

313/365

0.74

0.49–1.11 (0.149)

0

0.677

1.04

0.296

2.68

0.232

Recessive model

313/365

0.86

0.61–1.20 (0.374)

64.2

0.061

0.00

1.000

− 1.27

0.424

Allelic model

1094/1550

0.91

0.82–1.02 (0.111)

37.8

0.154

0.00

1.000

0.12

0.908

CC versus GG

313/365

0.67

0.41–1.10 (0.115)

0

0.451

0.00

1.000

3.19

0.193

GC versus GG

313/365

0.79

0.51–1.21 (0.275)

0

0.513

1.04

0.296

0.56

0.673

 Asian

Dominant model

1241/2316

1.04

0.85–1.25 (0.656)

0

0.502

1.02

0.308

0.01

0.995

Recessive model

1241/2316

1.02

0.86–1.21 (0.843)

0

0.642

1.02

0.308

− 0.03

0.978

Allelic model

1241/2316

1.02

0.92–1.13 (0.689)

0

0.398

1.02

0.308

− 0.01

0.991

CC versus GG

1241/2316

1.04

0.85–1.27 (0.703)

0.4

0.390

1.02

0.308

− 0.01

0.995

GC versus GG

1241/2316

1.04

0.88–1.22 (0.681)

0

0.709

1.02

0.308

− 0.01

0.990

 Male

Dominant model

211/942

1.16

0.75–1.80 (0.494)

0

0.766

0.00

1.000

0.49

0.709

Recessive model

211/942

1.07

0.74–1.53 (0.735)

69.1

0.039

0.00

1.000

0.74

0.593

Allelic model

211/942

1.15

0.93–1.43 (0.201)

68.9

0.040

0.00

1.000

0.60

0.656

CC versus GG

211/942

1.25

0.79–1.97 (0.340)

49.2

0.140

1.04

0.296

0.67

0.623

GC versus GG

211/942

1.11

0.78–1.58 (0.565)

65.2

0.057

0.00

1.000

0.27

0.832

 Female

Dominant model

677/1010

1.38

1.02–1.86 (0.037)

36.1

0.209

1.04

0.296

− 0.56

0.675

Recessive model

677/1010

0.98

0.77–1.23 (0.843)

3.6

0.354

1.04

0.296

− 0.96

0.513

Allelic model

677/1010

0.96

0.84–1.11 (0.590)

0

0.629

0.00

1.000

− 0.36

0.777

CC versus GG

677/1010

0.91

0.68–1.22 (0.534)

0

0.404

1.04

0.296

− 1.13

0.461

GC versus GG

677/1010

1.00

0.83–1.20 (0.969)

0

0.869

0.00

1.000

− 0.27

0.833

 Age < 60

Dominant model

163/215

0.94

0.47–1.90 (0.864)

0

0.713

0.00

1.000

No

No

Recessive model

163/215

1.00

0.67–1.51 (0.988)

64.2

0.039

0.00

1.000

No

No

Allelic model

163/215

1.09

0.79–1.51 (0.587)

73.0

0.054

0.00

1.000

No

No

CC versus GG

163/215

0.95

0.45–1.99 (0.891)

0

0.809

0.00

1.000

No

No

GC versus GG

163/215

0.93

0.45–1.93 (0.840)

6.6

0.301

0.00

1.000

No

No

 Age ≥ 60

Dominant model

1523/2630

0.98

0.86–1.13 (0.821)

8.6

0.362

1.88

0.060

− 0.79

0.475

Recessive model

1523/2630

1.02

0.87–1.20 (0.813)

31.9

0.184

0.38

0.707

0.12

0.909

Allelic model

2304/3815

0.97

0.90–1.05 (0.476)

18.4

0.279

0.73

0.466

− 0.69

0.510

CC versus GG

1523/2630

1.02

0.85–1.22 (0.853)

44.3

0.110

1.13

0.260

− 0.23

0.828

GC versus GG

1523/2630

0.97

0.83–1.13 (0.688)

0

0.421

1.50

0.133

− 1.03

0.360

Rs1871054

Overall

Dominant model

1204/1425

1.26

1.05–1.51 (0.013)

24.8

0.223

0.10

0.917

− 0.17

0.869

Recessive model

1204/1425

1.68

1.13–2.51 (0.011)

77.4

< 0.001

− 0.10

1.000

0.79

0.458

Allelic model

1204/1425

1.34

1.05–1.71 (0.019)

76.4

< 0.001

0.10

0.917

0.53

0.610

CC versus TT

1204/1425

1.62

1.05–2.50 (0.031)

69.1

0.001

0.31

0.754

0.34

0.743

TC versus TT

1204/1425

1.07

0.88–1.30 (0.506)

0

0.907

0.31

0.754

− 1.86

0.106

Subgroup

          

 European

Dominant model

346/428

1.05

0.76–1.45 (0.787)

0

0.660

0.73

0.462

3.94

0.029

Recessive model

346/428

1.85

0.94–3.63 (0.075)

72.5

0.006

1.71

0.086

3.78

0.032

Allelic model

346/428

1.33

0.91–1.95 (0.145)

66.0

0.019

1.22

0.221

4.29

0.023

CC versus TT

346/428

1.56

0.81–3.01 (0.187)

55.4

0.062

0.73

0.462

3.68

0.035

TC versus TT

346/428

0.92

0.65–1.31 (0.63)

0

0.999

0.24

0.806

0.43

0.697

 Asian

Dominant model

726/779

1.52

1.20–1.92 (0.001)

0

0.773

1.04

0.296

8.36

0.076

Recessive model

726/779

2.08

1.35–3.20 (0.001)

70.3

0.034

0.00

1.000

6.03

0.105

Allelic model

726/779

1.61

1.25–2.08 (< 0.001)

65.6

0.055

0.00

1.000

13.38

0.047

CC versus TT

726/779

2.21

1.52–3.22 (< 0.001)

38.1

0.199

0.00

1.000

13.63

0.047

TC versus TT

726/779

1.22

0.95–1.57 (0.125)

0

0.836

0.00

1.000

− 2.07

0.287

 Male

Dominant model

138/160

1.16

0.75–1.80 (0.494)

0

0.766

1.71

0.086

1.91

0.152

Recessive model

138/160

2.32

1.01–5.35 (0.049)

63.1

0.029

− 0.24

1.000

1.00

0.390

Allelic model

138/160

1.52

0.95–2.43 (0.080)

57.2

0.053

0.73

0.462

1.57

0.215

CC versus TT

138/160

2.02

0.91–4.47 (0.085)

39.6

0.157

− 0.24

1.000

1.43

0.248

TC versus TT

138/160

0.93

0.57–1.51 (0.767)

0

0.992

− 0.24

1.000

0.42

0.702

 Female

Dominant model

435/455

1.38

1.02–1.86 (0.037)

36.1

0.209

1.04

0.296

− 2.94

0.210

Recessive model

435/455

1.38

1.01–1.88 (0.042)

0

0.448

1.04

0.296

− 1.49

0.376

Allelic model

435/455

1.20

0.90–1.60 (0.220)

42.7

0.174

1.04

0.296

− 2.22

0.270

CC versus TT

435/455

1.43

0.82–2.50 (0.211)

60.8

0.003

1.04

0.296

− 2.10

0.283

TC versus TT

435/455

1.27

0.92–1.75 (0.143)

5.0

0.349

1.04

0.296

− 4.05

0.154

 Age < 60

Dominant model

211/942

1.31

1.02–1.68 (0.033)

0

0.562

0.24

0.806

0.09

0.930

Recessive model

211/942

1.91

1.07–3.40 (0.029)

68.7

0.012

1.22

0.221

1.40

0.255

Allelic model

211/942

1.39

1.01–1.92 (0.286)

61.4

0.035

0.73

0.462

0.85

0.459

CC versus GG

211/942

1.74

1.00–3.02 (0.049)

48.5

0.100

0.24

0.806

0.85

0.470

GC versus GG

211/942

1.16

0.89–1.51 (0.285)

0

0.835

0.24

0.806

− 1.78

0.173

 Age ≥ 60

Dominant model

677/1010

1.20

0.92–1.57 (0.172)

59.9

0.058

− 0.34

1.000

− 1.03

0.413

Recessive model

677/1010

1.49

0.77–2.89 (0.241)

86.7

< 0.001

1.70

0.089

− 4.09

0.055

Allelic model

677/1010

1.27

0.82–1.97 (0.286)

87.3

< 0.001

1.70

0.089

− 2.65

0.118

CC versus GG

677/1010

1.45

0.67–3.14 (0.349)

83.5

< 0.001

1.70

0.089

− 2.14

0.166

GC versus GG

677/1010

0.97

0.73–1.30 (0.854)

0

0.749

− 0.34

1.000

− 1.02

0.415

Rs1278279

Overall

Dominant model

316/379

1.19

0.88–1.61 (0.265)

0

0.950

0.00

1.000

No

No

Recessive model

316/379

0.80

0.44–1.47 (0.474)

0

0.995

0.00

1.000

No

No

Allelic model

316/379

1.02

0.80–1.30 (0.893)

0

0.962

0.00

1.000

No

No

AA versus GG

316/379

0.88

0.47–1.62 (0.671)

0

0.995

0.00

1.000

No

No

GA versus GG

316/379

1.26

0.91–1.73 (0.158)

0

0.935

0.00

1.000

No

No

Rs1044122

Overall

Dominant model

904/988

1.15

0.77–1.72 (0.479)

76.0

0.006

− 0.34

1.000

− 3.17

0.087

Recessive model

904/988

0.87

0.49–1.54 (0.634)

76.4

0.005

1.02

0.308

− 6.22

0.025

Allelic model

904/988

1.20

0.81–1.79 (0.359)

88.1

< 0.001

0.00

1.000

− 0.77

0.520

CC versus TT

904/988

0.96

0.48–1.93 (0.877)

81.9

0.001

1.02

0.308

− 4.92

0.039

TC versus TT

904/988

1.24

0.91–1.68 (0.179)

55.8

0.079

− 0.34

1.000

− 4.64

0.044

Subgroup

          

 Male

Dominant model

142/166

1.31

0.83–2.05 (0.248)

0

0.843

0.00

1.000

No

No

Recessive model

142/166

0.98

0.47–2.05 (0.962)

0

0.404

0.00

1.000

No

No

Allelic model

142/166

1.16

0.82–1.63 (0.398)

0

0.549

0.00

1.000

No

No

CC versus TT

142/166

1.15

0.53–2.48 (0.727)

0

0.459

0.00

1.000

No

No

TC versus TT

142/166

1.35

0.84–2.17 (0.222)

0

0.934

0.00

1.000

No

No

 Female

Dominant model

446/443

1.25

0.46–3.38 (0.658)

91.5

0.001

0.00

1.000

No

No

Recessive model

446/443

0.79

0.15–4.26 (0.782)

91.6

0.001

0.00

1.000

No

No

Allelic model

446/443

1.09

0.43–2.75 (0.852)

94.6

< 0.001

0.00

1.000

No

No

CC versus TT

446/443

0.89

0.12–6.83 (0.909)

93.6

< 0.001

0.00

1.000

No

No

TC versus TT

446/443

1.35

0.64–2.87 (0.430)

83.6

0.014

0.00

1.000

No

No

 Age < 60

Dominant model

211/942

1.29

0.61–2.71 (0.509)

89.2

0.002

0.00

1.000

No

No

Recessive model

211/942

0.88

0.22–3.40 (0.835)

91.5

0.001

0.00

1.000

No

No

Allelic model

211/942

1.12

0.54–2.33 (0.760)

93.8

< 0.001

0.00

1.000

No

No

CC versus GG

211/942

0.99

0.20–4.96 (0.991)

93.2

< 0.001

0.00

1.000

No

No

GC versus GG

211/942

1.38

0.81–2.34 (0.238)

76.5

0.039

0.00

1.000

No

No

 Age ≥ 60

Dominant model

677/1010

1.01

0.73–1.39 (0.972)

0

0.948

0.00

1.000

No

No

Recessive model

677/1010

0.84

0.56–1.26 (0.394)

0

0.767

0.00

1.000

No

No

Allelic model

677/1010

1.29

0.68–2.48 (0.432)

88.9

0.003

0.00

1.000

No

No

CC versus GG

677/1010

0.87

0.56–1.37 (0.542)

0

0.803

0.00

1.000

No

No

GC versus GG

677/1010

1.05

0.75–1.48 (0.759)

0

0.978

0.00

1.000

No

No

  1. Statistical significance values are shown in bold
  2. NO No date obtained