Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in systematic review

From: Is abaloparatide more efficacious on increasing bone mineral density than teriparatide for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis? An updated meta-analysis

Author Year

Publication type

Exposure

Comparator

Number

Age

Follow-up

Funding

Leder 2015

Multicenter II-RCT (NCT00542425)

Abaloparatide: 20 µg (n = 43); 40 µg (n = 43); 80 µg (n = 45);

Placebo (n = 45); Teriparatide 20 μg (n = 45)

222

20 µg: 66.3 ± 7.0; 40 µg: 64.5 ± 7.4; 80 µg: 64.8 ± 7.2; Placebo: 65.0 ± 7.1; Teriparatide: 64.5 ± 7.5

48 weeks1

Radius Health Inc

Miller 2016

Multicenter III-RCT (NCT01343004)

Abaloparatide: 80 µg (n = 824)

Placebo (n = 821); Teriparatide 20 μg (n = 818)

2463

80 µg: 68.9 ± 6.5; Placebo: 68.7 ± 6.5; Teriparatide: 68.8 ± 6.6

72 + 4 weeks2

Radius Health Inc

Miller 2021*

Multicenter I-RCT

(NCT04366726)

Abaloparatide*: 300 μg (n = 22)

/

22

300 μg: 65.2 ± 6.4

4 + 1 weeks3

Radius Health Inc

NCT01674621

Multicenter II-RCT (NCT01674621)

Abaloparatide#: 50 µg (n = 47); 80 µg (n = 49); 100 µg (n = 46); 150 µg (n = 43);

Placebo (n = 46)

231

50 µg: 65.9 ± 4.83; 80 µg: 66.4 ± 5.48; 100 µg: 65.7 ± 5.26; 150 µg: 66.3 ± 6.46; Placebo: 66.5 ± 7.27

24 + 4 weeks4

Radius Health Inc

Eastell 2019

Post hoc analysis5

Abaloparatide: 80 µg (n = 824)

Teriparatide 20 μg (n = 818)

1642

80 µg: 68.9 ± 6.5; Teriparatide: 68.8 ± 6.6

–

Radius Health Inc

McCloskey 2019

Post hoc analysis

Abaloparatide (n = 459)

Placebo (n = 468); Teriparatide (n = 473)

1400

Abaloparatide: 69.9 ± 6.67; Placebo: 70.0 ± 6.27; Teriparatide: 69.9 ± 6.37

–

Radius Health Inc

Reginster 2018

Post hoc analysis

Abaloparatide: 80 µg (n = 824)

Placebo (n = 821); Teriparatide 20 μg (n = 818)

2463

80 µg: 68.9 ± 6.5; Placebo: 68.7 ± 6.5; Teriparatide: 68.8 ± 6.6

–

Radius Health Inc

Leder 2019

Post hoc analysis

Abaloparatide 80 µg/Alendronate

(n = 558)

Placebo/Alendronate

(n = 581)

1139

80 µg: 68.9 ± 6.5; Placebo: 70.1 ± 6.3

–

Radius Health Inc

Reginster 2017

Post hoc analysis

Abaloparatide: 80 µg (n = 824)

Placebo (n = 821)

1645

80 µg: 68.9 ± 6.5; Placebo: 68.7 ± 6.5

–

Radius Health Inc

Bone 2018

Post hoc analysis

Abaloparatide 80 µg/Alendronate

(n = 558)

Placebo/Alendronate

(n = 581)

1139

80 µg: 68.9 ± 6.5; Placebo: 70.1 ± 6.3

–

Radius Health Inc

Cosman 2017

Post hoc analysis

Abaloparatide 80 µg/Alendronate

(n = 558)

Placebo/Alendronate

(n = 581)

1139

80 µg: 68.9 ± 6.5; Placebo: 70.1 ± 6.3

–

Radius Health Inc

Watts 2019

Post hoc analysis

Abaloparatide: 80 µg (n = 824)

Placebo (n = 821); Teriparatide 20 μg (n = 818)

2463

80 µg: 68.9 ± 6.5; Placebo: 68.7 ± 6.5; Teriparatide: 68.8 ± 6.6

–

Radius Health Inc

McCloskey 2017

Post hoc analysis

Abaloparatide: 80 µg (n = 824)

Placebo (n = 821)

1645

80 µg: 68.9 ± 6.5; Placebo: 68.7 ± 6.5

–

Radius Health Inc

Cosman 2016

Post hoc analysis

Abaloparatide: 80 µg (n = 824)

Placebo (n = 821)

1645

80 µg: 68.9 ± 6.5; Placebo: 68.7 ± 6.5

–

Radius Health Inc

Saag 2020

Post hoc analysis

Abaloparatide (n = 94)

Placebo (n = 103); Teriparatide (n = 99)

296

Abaloparatide: 59.4 ± 3.6; Placebo: 59.9 ± 3.3; Teriparatide: 58.8 ± 3.8

–

Radius Health Inc

McClung 2018

Post hoc analysis

Abaloparatide: 80 µg (n = 824)

Placebo (n = 821)

1645

80 µg: 68.9 ± 6.5; Placebo: 68.7 ± 6.5

–

Radius Health Inc

  1. *Phase I study in which the drug was administered to the patient's thigh
  2. #Abaloparatide Transdermal (50 µg/100 µg/150 µg); Abaloparatide Injection (80 µg)
  3. 1The patients in this RCT were treated for 48 weeks, but no follow-up time was given
  4. 2The patients in this RCT were treated for 72 weeks and had a follow-up of 4 weeks
  5. 3The patients in this RCT were treated for 4 weeks and had a follow-up of 1 weeks
  6. 4The patients in this RCT were treated for 24 weeks and had a follow-up of 4 weeks
  7. 5No follow-up period for post hoc analyses