Superior capsule reconstruction, partial cuff repair, graft interposition, arthroscopic debridement or balloon spacers for large and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 3 Graft interposition—included studies. OSS—Oxford Shoulder Score, JOA—Japanese Orthopaedic Association score

Author and date	Design	Mean age	No. of shoulders at f/u—PROMs	Follow-up duration (months)	Study results pooled	Graft type used	Functional/PROMs outcomes measured
Audenaert [39]	Case series	67	39	24–86	No	Mersilene mesh	Constant
Badhe [40]	Case series	66	10	36–60	Yes	Porcine dermal xenograft	Constant
Bond [41]	Case series	54.4	16	12–38	Yes	Human dermal allograft	UCLA, Constant
Dukan [42]	Case series	60.5	23	29.3	Yes	Porcine dermal xenograft	Constant
Gupta [43]	Case series	63	24	29–40	No	Human dermal allograft	Constant
Gupta [44]	Case series	60	27	24–40	No	Porcine dermal xenograft	Constant
Kim [45]	Case series	56	24	24–48	No	Human dermal allograft	UCLA, ASES, SST
Kokkalis [46]	Case series	58	21	33–72	Yes	Human dermal allograft	ASES
Modi [47]	Case series	62.6	61	12–72	No	Human dermal allograft	OSS
Mori [31]	Cohort–graft interposition vs PCR	65.7	24	35.6	No	Fascia lata autograft	UCLA, Constant, ASES
Nada 2010[48]	Case series	66.5	21	36	No	Polyester fibre mesh	Constant
Pandey [33]	Cohort–graft interposition vs PCR	58	13	24–60	Yes	Human dermal allograft	Constant, OSS
Petrie [49]	Case series	67.2	31	24	No	Polyester fibre mesh	OSS
Rhee [50]	Case series	61	31	24–67	No	Biceps autograft	UCLA, Constant
Rhee [51]	Case series	66.9	24	12	Yes	Biceps autograft	ASES, QuickDASH
Sano [52]	Case series	64	14	12–51	Yes	Biceps autograft	JOA
Dimitrios [53]	Case series	64.9	68	31–77	Yes	Fascia lata autograft	Constant
Wong [54]	Case series	53.6	45	24–68	No	Human dermal allograft	UCLA

ISSN: 1749-799X