Skip to main content

Table 5 Stratified analysis of type of laminoplasty on association between effectiveness and K-line

From: Are clinical outcomes affected by laminoplasty method and K-line in patients with cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament? A multicenter study

Variables*

mFDL

ODL

OR

95% CI

P value

OR

95% CI

P value

Postoperative JOA score

1.799

0.371–8.732

0.466

2.329

0.836–6.486

0.106

Operative time

0.631

0.091–4.374

0.641

0.736

0.172–3.152

0.679

Blood loss

1.954

0.460–8.298

0.364

0.528

0.211–1.324

0.173

JOA score’s RR

2.864

0.284–28.897

0.372

1.376

0.507–3.739

0.531

  1. mFDL modified French-door laminoplasty, ODL open-door laminoplasty, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, JOA Japanese Orthopaedic Association, RR recovery rate
  2. *Grouped by the variables below. Outcome variables: grouped by postoperative JOA score (bounded by ≥ 14), grouped by operative time (bounded by ≥ 90 min), grouped by blood loss (bounded by ≥ 300 mL), grouped by JOA score recovery rate (bounded by 0.82). Stratification factors: type of laminoplasty (groups: mFDL and ODL). Independent variables: K-line (+) and (−). The adjusted covariates for the JOA score and its RR were age, sex, BMI, preoperative JOA score, follow-up duration, and OPLL type. The adjusted covariates for operative time and blood loss were age, sex, BMI, preoperative JOA score, and OPLL type