Skip to main content

Table 1 Patients’ demographics

From: Are clinical outcomes affected by laminoplasty method and K-line in patients with cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament? A multicenter study

Variables

Total (n = 200)

mFDL (n = 69)

ODL (n = 131)

Statistics

P value

Age (years, \(\overline{\mathrm{x} }\) ± s)

59.9 ± 9.1

62.0 ± 8.0

59.0 ± 9.0

T = 2.495

0.378

Gender

   

χ2 = 3.541

0.060

Male

144 (72.0%)

44 (63.8%)

100 (76.3%)

  

Female

56 (28.0%)

25 (36.2%)

31 (23.7%)

  

BMI (kg/m2, \(\overline{\mathrm{x} }\) ± s)

25.5 ± 3.7

25.1 ± 3.5

25.6 ± 3.9

T = − 0.906

0.366

OPLL type

   

χ2 = 50.332

< 0.001

Continuous

71 (35.5%)

46 (66.7%)

25 (19.1%)

  

Mixed

67 (33.5%)

18 (26.1%)

49 (37.4%)

  

Segmental

51 (25.5%)

3 (4.3%)

48 (36.6%)

  

Unclassified

11 (5.5%)

2 (2.9%)

9 (6.9%)

  

K-line

   

χ2 = 0.295

0.587

Positive

155 (77.5%)

55 (79.7%)

100 (76.3%)

  

Negative

45 (22.5%)

14 (20.3%)

31 (23.7%)

  

F/U duration (month)

42 (36–54)

38 (36–42)

48 (35–70)

U = 6118.5

< 0.001

Operative time (min)

110 (90–150)

97 (90–120)

129 (92–166)

U = 6231.5

< 0.001

Blood loss (ml)

200 (100–400)

300 (200–400)

200 (25–400)

U = 3225.5

0.001

Pre-JOA score

11.3 (9.0,14.0)

9.0 (8.0,12.5)

12.0 (10.0,15.0)

U = 5915.5

< 0.001

Post-JOA score

15.0 (13.0–16.0)

15.0 (14.0–16.0)

15.0 (12.0–16.7)

U = 4521.5

0.996

JOA score’s RR

0.60 (0.05–0.82)

0.67 (0.50–0.75)

0.47 (0–0.89)

U = 4003.0

0.183

  1. The preoperative JOA score, OPLL type, F/U duration, operative time, blood loss, postoperative JOA score, and JOA score RR are presented as median (interquartile range)
  2. mFDL modified French-door laminoplasty, ODL open-door laminoplasty, BMI body mass index, JOA Japanese Orthopaedic Association, OPLL ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, F/U follow-up, RR recovery rate