Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the 14 studies included in this meta-analysis

From: Changes in cervical alignment of Zero-profile device versus conventional cage-plate construct after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis

References

Design

Number of patients

Surgical level

Average follow-up (mos)

Mean ages (years)

Quality assessment (NOQAS)

ZP

CP

ZP

CP

ZP

CP

Selection

Comparability

Exposure

Total score

Chen et al. [2]

P

37

32

2

40.6 ± 9.2

43.5 ± 10.4

48.9 ± 4.0

49.5 ± 4.2

3

2

3

8

Chen et al. [3]

P

34

38

3

36

36

56.2 ± 5.7

56.9 ± 5.9

4

2

3

9

Chen et al. [4]

R

33

38

3

30.0 ± 5

31.5 ± 4.5

49.3 ± 3.7

48.8 ± 3.9

3

2

3

8

He et al. [5]

P

52

52

2,3,4

24

24

55.4 ± 12.4

59.5 ± 12.6

3

1

3

7

Lan et al. [6]

R

35

33

1

23.68 ± 1.93

24.39 ± 2.00

54.05 ± 10.11

52.09 ± 10.46

4

1

3

8

Li et al. [14]

R

61

55

1

24

24

58.8 ± 4.6

58.5 ± 4.9

4

2

3

9

Liu et al. [15]

R

28

32

3,4

23.3 ± 6.9

24.2 ± 6.4

56.6 ± 9.7

57.5 ± 9.5

3

2

3

8

Lu et al. [10]

R

22

24

2

30.5 ± 5.2

32.1 ± 6.5

56.6 ± 6.4

58.6 ± 7.2

3

2

3

8

Qi et al. [11]

R

83

107

1,2,3

17.9 ± 4.2

19.0 ± 4.2

42.3

42.5

3

1

3

7

Shi et al. [12]

R

34

31

2

24

24

56.1 ± 4.5

55.8 ± 4.9

4

2

3

9

Shi et al. [13]

R

27

34

3

60

60

54.7 ± 7.6

56.4 ± 7.5

3

2

3

8

Wang et al. [17]

R

22

25

1

33.59 ± 5.52

33.16 ± 5.97

50.86 ± 8.79

53.68 ± 8.96

3

2

3

8

Wang et al. [16]

R

27

30

1

35.2

35.5

51.6 ± 11.3

54.0 ± 8.5

3

1

3

7

Zhang et al. [18]

R

74

116

1

34.07 ± 3.20

36.50 ± 6.28

50.14 ± 6.05

50.29 ± 9.06

3

2

3

8

  1. P, prospective study; R, retrospective study