Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment using the Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale for each non-randomized controlled trial

From: Zero-profile implant versus conventional cage–plate construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Variable

Lan et al. [7]

Vaishnav et al. [8]

Wei et al. [11]

He et al. [16]

Noh et al. [17]

Lee et al. [18]

Son et al. [19]

Wang et al. [21]

Wang et al. [23]

Yan et al. [24]

Li et al. [25]

Shao et al. [27]

Yi et al. [28]

Wang et al. [29]

Sun et al. [31]

Hu et al. [32]

Sha et al. [33]

Chang et al. [9]

Ruan et al. [34]

Zhu et al. [35]

Zhang et al. [36]

Gou et al. [10]

Luo et al. [37]

Selection

                       

Representativeness of exposed cohort

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Selection of non-exposed cohort

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Ascertainment of exposure

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study

 

1

1

1

       

1

1

      

1

   

Comparability

                       

Study controlled for age or gender

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Study controlled for any additional factor

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 

1

1

 

1

1

1

1

1

1

Outcome

                       

Assessment of outcome

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Adequacy of follow-up of cohort

1

 

1

   

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Total

8

8

9

8

7

7

8

8

8

8

8

9

9

6

8

8

7

8

8

9

8

8

8