Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality assessment of the baseline characteristics of the included studies

From: Efficacy and safety of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for cervical disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

Country

Study design

Sample size

Gender (female/male)

Age

Duration (month)

Operation time (min)

Hospital stay (day)

Interventions

MINORS score

Ahn et al. [25]

2005a

Korea

Non-RCT

17

11/6

43.10

48.20 ± 13.75

PECD

16

Ahn et al. [26]

2005b

Korea

Non-RCT

36

17/19

43.10

PECD

16

Oh et al. [14]

2017

Korea

Non-RCT

100

35/65

46.90

4.80

PECD

17

Liao et al. [27]

2018

China

Non-RCT

22

13/9

48.80 ± 8.30

7.90 ± 3.20

69.70 ± 16.50

PECD

18

Shu et al. [28]

2019

China

Non-RCT

32

18/14

63.00 ± 10.50

56.00 ± 41.60

3.20 ± 1.30

PECD

17

Xiao et al. [29]

2019

China

Non-RCT

40

22/18

52.90 ± 14.30

11.20 ± 5.60

74.48 ± 7.08

3.86 ± 0.85

PECD

17

Jiang et al. [13]

2020

China

Non-RCT

36

13/23

59.89 ± 9.07

6.40 ± 0.74

PECD

16

Ahn et al. [15]

2020

Korea

Non-RCT

51

23/28

42.20

55.20 ± 18.03

2.18 ± 1.16

PECD

19

Ma et al. [16]

2021

China

Non-RCT

56

32/24

62.12 ± 2.36

6.22 ± 3.18

53.45 ± 4.12

4.34 ± 0.12

PECD

18