Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the cervical sagittal parameters between two groups

From: Subaxial lordosis loss and influence factors after posterior atlantoaxial fusion

 

Pre-operation

Final follow-up

Loss of subaxial lordosis

Increase in subaxial lordosis

Loss of subaxial lordosis

Increase in subaxial lordosis

C0–C2 (°)

17.4 ± 18.0

23.2 ± 16.3

26.2 ± 10.8

29.1 ± 8.1

C1–C2 (°)

14.2 ± 19.8

11.8 ± 17.6

19.6 ± 8.7

16.7 ± 6.9

C2–C7 (°)

27.6 ± 10.5

10.5 ± 10.5#

11.6 ± 12.5

18.3 ± 10.4

C0–C7 (°)

44.8 ± 25.5

33.7 ± 17.2

37.8 ± 14.1

47.6 ± 12.2

C2–C7 SVA (mm)

5.6 ± 12.2

16.5 ± 14.9

16.4 ± 17.0

4.6 ± 9.9

T1S (°)

25.8 ± 7.6

21.7 ± 8.4

22.6 ± 11.5

23.9 ± 5.5

NT (°)

49.4 ± 9.0

51.3 ± 10.0

54.6 ± 9.7

50.9 ± 8.8

TIA (°)

75.2 ± 13.9

73.0 ± 10.4

77.2 ± 10.8

74.7 ± 10.1

  1. #Compared with loss of subaxial lordosis, P < 0.05