Skip to main content

Table 3 Subgroup analysis for the diagnosis of PJI by D-dimer

From: The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Subgroup Analysis

Number of studies

Sensitivity (95% CI)

Specificity (95% CI)

Positive likelihood ratio (95% CI)

Negative likelihood ratio (95% CI)

All studies

10

0.81 [0.71, 0.88]

0.74 [0.61, 0.84]

3.1 [2.0, 5.0]

0.26 [0.16, 0.41]

Serum samples

7

0.86 [0.76, 0.92]

0.80 [0.65, 0.89]

4.2 [2.4, 7.3]

0.18 [0.11, 0.29]

China

8

0.76 [0.67, 0.83]

0.75 [0.65, 0.83]

3.0 [2.0, 4.5]

0.32 [0.22, 0.48]

Threshold value of 850 ng/ml

4

0.85 [0.69, 0.94]

0.72 [0.43, 0.90]

3.0 [1.3, 7.1]

0.21 [0.09, 0.45]

Threshold for other

6

0.78 [0.67, 0.86]

0.75 [0.63, 0.84]

3.2 [1.9, 5.2]

0.29 [0.17, 0.49]

Inflammatory disease exclusion

6

0.76 [0.65, 0.84]

0.74 [0.62, 0.83]

2.9 [1.9, 4.4]

0.33 [0.21, 0.50]

Inflammatory disease not ruled out

4

0.87 [0.71, 0.95]

0.75 [0.45, 0.92]

3.5 [1.3, 9.4]

0.18 [0.07, 0.42]

Sample size greater than 100

6

0.83 [0.68, 0.92]

0.71 [0.50, 0.85]

2.8 [1.5, 5.2]

0.24 [0.12, 0.49]

Sample size less than 100

4

0.78 [0.66, 0.86]

0.80 [0.71, 0.87]

3.9 [2.5, 6.2]

0.28 [0.17, 0.45]