Skip to main content

Table 3 Subgroup analysis

From: 3.0 T MRI is more recommended to detect acetabular labral tears than MR Arthrography: an updated meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy

Subgroup

Se (95% CI)

Sp (95% CI)

LR+ (95% CI)

LR– (95% CI)

DOR (95% CI)

Number of studies

1.5 T

MRI

0.69 (0.64–0.75)

0.79 (0.67–0.87)

1.64 (0.79–3.40)

0.65 (0.37–1.15)

3.18 (0.84–12.07)

6

1.5 T

MRA

0.82 (0.79–0.84)

0.59 (0.52–0.66)

1.90 (1.39–2.58)

0.26 (0.16–0.41)

11.04 (4.75–25.63)

16

3.0 T

MRI

0.87 (0.82–0.91)

0.77 (0.64–0.87)

2.40 (1.32–4.35)

0.14 (0.04–0.49)

20.47 (4.56–91.83)

5

3.0 T

MRA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

2

Reference-1 MRI

0.77 (0.73–0.81)

0.79 (0.70–0.85)

2.07 (1.30–3.30)

0.38 (0.22–0.66)

7.79 (2.87–21.12)

10

Reference-1 MRA

0.81 (0.78–0.84)

0.59 (0.52–0.66)

1.86 (1.33–2.59)

0.30 (0.18–0.48)

8.78 (3.67–21.04)

14

Reference-2

MRI

0.77 (0.62–0.92)

0.50 (0.32–0.68)

NA

NA

NA

1

Reference-2

MRA

0.92 (0.85–0.96)

0.67 (0.45–0.84)

2.64 (1.20–5.84)

0.14 (0.07–0.27)

38.16 (9.84–148.0)

4

  1. Reference-1: Arthroscopy, Reference-2: Arthroscopy and open surgery, NA not available