From: Diagnostic accuracy of calprotectin in periprosthetic joint infection: a diagnostic meta-analysis
Study | Year | Country | Study design | Gender(M/F) | Median age* | Joint type | Detection method | Cutoff values | Gold standard |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bakker et al. [17] | 2017 | Netherlands | P | NA | NA | Hip/knee/shoulder | LFA | 50 mg/L | MSIS |
Bakker et al. [16] | 2017 | Netherlands | P | 25/36 | 65/60 | Hip/knee/shoulder/elbow | LFA | 50 mg/L | MSIS |
Salari et al. [13] | 2019 | Italy | P | 36/40 | 69 | Knee | ELISA | 50 mg/L | ICM |
Trotter et al. [14] | 2020 | UK | R | 37/32 | 74.3 | Hip/knee | LFA | 50 mg/L | ICM/ICM-cr |
Zhang et al. [18] | 2020 | China | P | 21/42 | 64/57 | Hip/knee | ELISA | 173 ug/ml | MSIS |
Grzelecki et al. [12] | 2020 | Poland | P | 25/60 | 65.5/68.3 | Hip/knee | ELISA | 1.0 mg/L or 1.5 mg/L | ICM |
Warren et al. [15] | 2021 | USA | P | 57/66 | 66.9/65.4 | Knee | ELISA/ LFA | 50 mg/L | MSIS |