Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the studies in meta-analysis for the diagnosis of PJI applying calprotectin

From: Diagnostic accuracy of calprotectin in periprosthetic joint infection: a diagnostic meta-analysis

Study

Year

Country

Study design

Gender(M/F)

Median age*

Joint type

Detection method

Cutoff values

Gold standard

Bakker et al. [17]

2017

Netherlands

P

NA

NA

Hip/knee/shoulder

LFA

50 mg/L

MSIS

Bakker et al. [16]

2017

Netherlands

P

25/36

65/60

Hip/knee/shoulder/elbow

LFA

50 mg/L

MSIS

Salari et al. [13]

2019

Italy

P

36/40

69

Knee

ELISA

50 mg/L

ICM

Trotter et al. [14]

2020

UK

R

37/32

74.3

Hip/knee

LFA

50 mg/L

ICM/ICM-cr

Zhang et al. [18]

2020

China

P

21/42

64/57

Hip/knee

ELISA

173 ug/ml

MSIS

Grzelecki et al. [12]

2020

Poland

P

25/60

65.5/68.3

Hip/knee

ELISA

1.0 mg/L or 1.5 mg/L

ICM

Warren et al. [15]

2021

USA

P

57/66

66.9/65.4

Knee

ELISA/ LFA

50 mg/L

MSIS

  1. *The values were given as the number with PJI/non-PJI
  2. P prospective study, R retrospective study, LFA lateral flow assay, NA not applicable