Skip to main content

Table 1 The characteristics of included studies

From: Staples versus sutures for skin closure in hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Author/year

Period

Study

Operation

Closure material

Stitch technique for suture group

Size

Age (mean)

SEX (male)

BMI

 

Closure length

 

Follow-up(days)

Staples

Sutures

Staples

Sutures

Staples

Sutures

Staples

Sutures

 

Staples

Sutures

  

Khan/2006

2004

RCT

THA

3.0 poliglecaprone

Suture, skin staples

Subcutaneous continuous suture

36

33

71

(33–78)

69

(49–88)

20/36

17/33

26.9 (21.1–38.9)

27.7 (19.8–38.1)

 

10.5 (7.5–22)

10 (7.5–15)

 

56–84

Singh/2006

2001–2002

RCT

THA, hemiarthroplasty

Subcuticular vicryl

skin clips

Subcutaneous continuous suture

17

17

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

 

Unclear

 

2,5,7,10,14

Buttaro/2015

2011–2012

RCT

THA

3.0 polypropylene suture, staples

Intradermal suture

112

119

62 (range 21–91)

Unclear

Unclear

 

12.2 (9–22)

 

15,45

Lu, Y/2018

2013–2015

RC

THA, hemiarthroplasty

Nylon sutures, staples

interrupted suture

111

141

64.1

(25–90)

67.3

(22–99)

53/111

56/141

24.4 (17.5–31.6)

23.5 (14.9–20.6)

 

Unclear

 

30

Rui, M/2018

2014–2015

RCT

THA

4.0 absorbable

subcuticular suture, staples

Subcutaneous continuous suture

83

82

55.7

(33–78)

57.8

(35–79)

36/83

39/82

27.1 (17.6–33.4)

26.8 (16.4–32.2)

 

13.8 (12–16)

13.6 (12–15)

 

90,365

Mallee/2020

2012–2016

RCT

THA

Absorbable suture or Donati-stitches, staples

Intradermal suture/interrupted suture

268

267

70

(29–92)

70

(38–90)

182/268

175/267

28(18–48)

27(17–46)

 

Unclear

 

14,90,180,365

  1. The characteristics of all included studies
  2. RC: retrospective cohort; RCT: randomized controlled trial; THA: total hip arthroplasty