Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate analysis of risk factors for poor outcome

From: Surgical outcomes and risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with cervical spine metastasis: a prospective study

Factors

Good outcome (n = 28)

Poor outcome (n = 18)

P

Age

  

0.639

 ≥ 65 years

19 (41.3)

11 (23.9)

 

 < 65 years

9 (19.6)

7 (15.2)

 

Sex

  

0.039*

 Male

13 (28.2)

3 (6.5)

 

 Female

15 (32.6)

15 (32.6)

 

Revised Tokuhashi score, points

7.4 ± 2.7

5.2 ± 1.4

0.002*

New Katagiri score, points

4.1 ± 2.2

5.6 ± 1.2

0.013*

SINS, points

11.7 ± 2.8

10.9 ± 2.4

0.335

Level of the main lesion

  

0.006*

 Upper cervical spine (C1–2)

8 (17.3)

1 (2.2)

 

 Middle cervical spine (C3–6)

13 (28.3)

5 (10.9)

 

 Cervicothoracic junction (C7, T1)

7 (15.2)

12 (26.1)

 

ESCC grade at baseline

  

0.732

 Grade ≥ 2

20 (43.5)

12 (26.1)

 

 Grade ≤ 1

8 (17.4)

6 (13.0)

 

ECOGPS at baseline

  

0.953

 PS ≥ 3

20 (43.5)

13 (28.3)

 

 PS ≤ 2

8 (17.4)

5 (10.9)

 

Frankel grade at baseline

  

0.016*

 Grades A and B

0 (0.0)

1 (2.2)

 

 Grades C and D

14 (30.4)

15 (32.6)

 

 Grade E

14 (30.4)

2 (4.3)

 

Preoperative chemotherapy

  

0.142

 Yes

8 (17.4)

9 (19.6)

 

 No

20 (43.5)

9 (19.6)

 

Preoperative radiotherapy

  

0.466

 Yes

8 (17.4)

7 (15.2)

 

 No

20 (43.5)

11 (23.9)

 
  1. Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation
  2. SINS, Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score; ESCC, Epidural Spinal Cord Compression; ECOGPS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
  3. *Statistically significant at P < 0.100