Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the studies included in the review

From: Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

Country

Journal

Design

No

(patient)

Group

NO

(patient)

Age

(Year)

Gender

(M/F)

BMI

Diagnosis

Model

Fredborg et al. [15]

2020

Denmark

Bone & Joint Journal

RCT

100

PFA

50

64.0 ±8.6

11/39

28.0 ±4.7

IPFOA

Stryker

TKA

50

64.4 ±9.3

12/38

27.8 ±4.1

DePuy

Joseph et al. [27]

2020

UK

Bone & Joint Journal

RCT

60

PFA

31

64.7 ±10.5

9/22

28.9 ±6.7

IPFOA

Zimmer Biomet

Stryker

TKA

29

64.4 ±12.8

3/26

29.2 ±4.2

Odgaard et al. [20]

2018

Denmark

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

RCT

100

PFA

50

64.0±8.9

23/77

NC

IPFOA

Stryker

TKA

50

DePuy

Clement et al. [25]

2019

UK

Bone & Joint Journal

retrospective

108

PFA

54

62.4 ±11.3

5/49

NC

IPFOA

NC

TKA

54

64.0 ±10.8

8/46

Stryker

Kamikovski et al. [28]

2019

Canada

Journal of Arthroplasty

prospective

42

PFA

19 (23knees)

50.4 ±3.4

16/3

28.5 ±5.6

IPFOA

Stryker,

Zimmer Biomet

TKA

23

50.5 ±2.4

19/4

28.2 ±5.8

Zimmer Biomet

Perrone et al. [29]

2018

Germany

Technology and Health Care

retrospective

50

PFA

19

52.4 ±10.6

6/13

27.9 ±4.4

IPFOA

Zimmer Biomet

TKA

31

71.9 ±9.8

12/19

29.4 ±4.5

KOA

Zimmer Biomet

Dahm et al. [26]

2010

USA

American Journal of Orthopedics

retrospective

45

PFA

23

60(39-81)

NC

30

IPFOA

Stryker

TKA

22

69(44-83)

30

Zimmer ,DePuy

  1. RCT randomized controlled trial, No the number of patients, PFA patellofemoral arthroplasty, TKA total knee arthroplasty, NC not clear, M/F male/female, BMI body mass index, IPFOA isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis, KOA knee osteoarthritis, USA United States of America, UK United Kingdom