Skip to main content

Table 2 Outcome scores in mean (range)

From: The results of using a tendon autograft as a new rotator cable for patients with a massive rotator cuff tear: a technical note and comparative outcome analysis

 

Preop

3 months

6 months

12 monthsa

Group 1

Group 2

Group 1

Group 2

Group 1

Group 2

Group 1

Group 2

CMS pain

6.3 (0–10)

7.0 (0–15)

7.5 (5–10)

13.7 (10–15)

10.0 (5–10)

10.0(5–15)

13.3 (10–15)

11.0 (0–15)

CMS activity

7.0 (4–12)

10.4 (4–14)

5.0 (4–6)

16.5 (15–19)

9.3 (4–15)

14.8(12–20)

16.0 (10–20)

16.4 (8–20)

CMS mobility

17.5 (10–24)

23.6 (8–36)

10.0 (8–12)

26.0 (20–30)

14.5 (8–20)

27.2(22–34)

20.6 (18–26)

30.8 (20–36)

CMS strength

12.5 (5–25)

9.46 (2–19)

12.5 (5–20)

9.65 (8–12)

14.3 (5–22)

10.4(4–18)

19.7 (10–25)

9.88 (2–17)

CMS total

43.3 (31–32)

49.0 (26–73)

35.0 (28–42)

65.9 (61–73)

46.5 (28–67)

62.0(51–69)

69.7 (53–80)

68.1 (30–81)

SST

5.5 (1–8)

4.75 (1–8)

5.3 (2–7)

6.3 (6–7)

WORC

55.3 (36–52)

43.3 (39–53)

47.7 (32–60)

60.3 (49–67)

VAS pain

45.0 (30–70)

60 (30–80)

56.3 (20–80)

27 (20–50)

37.5 (10–65)

38(20–60)

16.7 (10–20)

26 (10–80)

VAS disability

53.3 (8–80)

54 (20–10)

65.0 (40–85)

35 (30–40)

46.3 (20–70)

42 (30–60)

40.0 (15–70)

30 (10–80)

VAS satisfaction

46.3 (40–50)

43.8 (5–60)

63.4 (45–85)

  1. Group 1, surgical treatment; group 2, non-surgical treatment
  2. WORC depicted as a percentage of normal/maximum score
  3. aResults of three out of four patients