Skip to main content

Table 1 Preoperative characteristics of patients with follow-up data

From: Comparative study on mid- and long-term clinical effects of medial pivot prosthesis and posterior-stabilized prosthesis after total knee arthroplasty

 

MPb group (n = 290)

PSc group (n = 237)

Statistics

P values

Gender (female)

228 (78.6%)

169 (71.3%)

3.753

0.053

Age (year)

74.5 ± 6.97

75.4 ± 5.70

31,359.500

0.084

Body mass index (kg/m2)

27.89 ± 3.65

27.43 ± 3.51

32585.000

0.306

Side (left)

140 (48.3%)

110 (46.4%)

0.181

0.053

Length of follow-up (month)

81.04 ± 7.66

80.78 ± 7.85

33,509.000

0.622

KSSa clinical score

40.76 ± 10.00

41.35 ± 7.50

33,675.500

0.692

KSS function score

41.00 ± 11.44

41.18 ± 11.20

34,013.000

0.437

WOMACd total score

80.72 ± 6.35

80.04 ± 7.09

32,166.000

0.206

WOMAC pain score

15.00 ± 3.23

14.98 ± 4.08

34,117.500

0.885

WOMAC rigidity score

5.93 ± 1.34

5.92 ± 1.65

33,944.000

0.800

WOMAC activity score

59.19 ± 6.35

59.14 ± 5.27

32,054.500

0.183

  1. Comparison of the main indicators of the two groups
  2. aKSS knee scoring system
  3. bMP medial pivot prosthesis
  4. cPS posterior-stabilized prosthesis
  5. dWOMAC the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index