Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Comparing total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture in the active elderly over 75 years old: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

Author

Year

Location

No., THA/HA (P)

Garden classification

Mean age, THA/HA (years)

THA details

HA details

Operative time, THA/HA (min)

Mean follow-up duration (months)

Reoperation causes

Risk factors of dislocation

Keating

2006

Scotland

69/69

TypeIII/IV

75.2/75.0

Cemented femoral component

Bipolar, cemented

NA

24

THA: 3 for dislocation, 2 for infection, 1 for wound dehiscence. HA: NA

Posterior exposure

Avery and Baker

2011 and 2006

UK

40/41

TypeIII/IV

74.2/75.8

Cemented acetabular and femoral component

Cemented

NA

108

THA: 1 for femoral stem subsidence. HA: 3 for acetabular erosion, 1 for peri-prosthetic fracture

NA

Hedbeck and R. Blomfeldt

2011 and 2007

Sweden

60/60

TypeIII/IV

80.5/80.7

Cemented acetabular and femoral component

Bipolar, cemented

120/78

48.4

THA: 2 for infection. HA: 1 for peri-prosthetic fracture

Severe cognitive dysfunction

Macaulay and Macaulay

2008 and 2008

The USA

17/23

TypeIII/IV

82/77

NA

Unipolar or bipolar, and cemented or uncemented

89/82

34

NA

NA

Tol and van den Bekerom

2017 and 2010

Netherlands

115/137

TypeIII/IV

82.1/80.3

Cemented acetabular and femoral component

Bipolar, cemented

NA

144

THA and HA: 5 for loosening of the prosthesis, 2 for acetabular erosion, 1 for deep infection

Posterolateral approach (compared with anterolateral approach)

  1. NA not available