Skip to main content

Table 2 HU values at the trajectory of CBT and TT in different decades

From: Differences in bone mineral density of trajectory between lumbar cortical and traditional pedicle screws

 

Sex

Total

20–29

30–39

40–49

50–59

60–69

Above 70

CBT

M

384.75 ± 103.44

454.75 ± 83.39*∆‡ €

432.14 ± 74.22†•£

405.15 ± 85.45Я

379.08 ± 104.15ØΨ

336.86 ± 107.88

306.65 ± 76.67

F

344.45 ± 102.84

432.68 ± 77.80*∆‡ €

401.93 ± 89.90†•£

363.64 ± 75.76

344.20 ± 116.75ØΨ

289.62 ± 63.70

257.76 ± 59.71

T

365.19 ± 105.05

444.37 ± 81.33*∆‡ €

417.03 ± 83.57※†•£

387.16 ± 83.71

361.64 ± 111.68ØΨ

313.87 ± 92.03~

281.55 ± 72.56

TT

M

211.71 ± 64.74

278.56 ± 47.30*∆‡ €

254.75 ± 55.55†•£

225.40 ± 38.08

197.18 ± 45.05ØΨ

170.64 ± 51.05~

148.36 ± 44.44

F

185.56 ± 67.61

257.07 ± 47.94#*∆‡ €

214.94 ± 52.67†•£

209.79 ± 77.45$^Я

182.80 ± 54.90ØΨ

143.32 ± 34.67

124.98 ± 31.23

T

199.02 ± 67.89

268.44 ± 48.66#*∆‡ €

234.84 ± 57.54※†•£

218.64 ± 58.77$^Я

189.99 ± 50.59ØΨ

157.35 ± 45.839~

136.35 ± .9.8

  1. Statistical significance (p < 0.05)
  2. CBT cortical bone trajectory, TT traditional trajectory, M males, F females, T total
  3. #20–29 versus 30–39 significant difference
  4. *20–29 versus 40–49 significant difference
  5. 20–29 versus 50–59 significant difference
  6. 20–29 versus 60–69 significant difference
  7. 20–29 versus over 70 significant difference
  8. 30–39 versus 40–49 significant difference
  9. 30–39 versus 50–59 significant difference
  10. 30–39 versus 60–69 significant difference
  11. £30–39 versus over 70 significant difference
  12. $40–49 versus 50–59 significant difference
  13. ^40–49 versus 60–69 significant difference
  14. Я40–49 versus over 70 significant difference
  15. Ø50–59 versus 60–69 significant difference
  16. Ψ50–59 versus over 70 significant difference
  17. ~60–69 versus over 70 significant difference