Skip to main content

Table 4 Reported rates of infection eradication in literature with two-stage exchange

From: High cure rate of periprosthetic hip joint infection with multidisciplinary team approach using standardized two-stage exchange

Study Number of patients Period of study Definition of failure Rate of infection eradication (%)
Chen et al. [5] 155 hips 2001–2010 Repeated operation
Long-term antibiotics
91.7
Oussedik et al. [7] 39 hips 1999–2002 Recurrent infection 96
Tan et al. [8] 186 knees
81 hips
1999–2013 Delphi-based definition [17] 76
Lange et al. [26] 82 hips 2003–2008 Kamme et al. [47] 85.4
Triantafyllopoulos et al. [27] 239 knees
261 hips
1998–2014 Wound healing problems
Elevated ESR/CRP
Long-term suppression
91.2
Fink et al. [28] 36 hips 2002–2006 Clinical signs of infection
CRP more than 10 mg/dl
Osteolysis
100
Berend et al. [30] 186 hips 1996–2009 Further surgery for infection 83
Ibrahim et al. [6] 125 hips 2000–2008 Recurrence of infection  
Leung et al. [48] 50 hips 1998–2006 Recurrence of infection 79