Skip to main content

Table 4 Reported rates of infection eradication in literature with two-stage exchange

From: High cure rate of periprosthetic hip joint infection with multidisciplinary team approach using standardized two-stage exchange

Study

Number of patients

Period of study

Definition of failure

Rate of infection eradication (%)

Chen et al. [5]

155 hips

2001–2010

Repeated operation

Long-term antibiotics

91.7

Oussedik et al. [7]

39 hips

1999–2002

Recurrent infection

96

Tan et al. [8]

186 knees

81 hips

1999–2013

Delphi-based definition [17]

76

Lange et al. [26]

82 hips

2003–2008

Kamme et al. [47]

85.4

Triantafyllopoulos et al. [27]

239 knees

261 hips

1998–2014

Wound healing problems

Elevated ESR/CRP

Long-term suppression

91.2

Fink et al. [28]

36 hips

2002–2006

Clinical signs of infection

CRP more than 10 mg/dl

Osteolysis

100

Berend et al. [30]

186 hips

1996–2009

Further surgery for infection

83

Ibrahim et al. [6]

125 hips

2000–2008

Recurrence of infection

 

Leung et al. [48]

50 hips

1998–2006

Recurrence of infection

79