Skip to main content

Table 4 Revision and radiolucent lines after total knee arthroplasty with ceramic femoral prosthesis

From: Clinical outcomes of ceramic femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Author, year

 

Duration of follow-up (years)

Revision

Radiolucent line

No. of knees

Breakage of prosthesis

Infection

Aseptic loosening

Instability

Wear

Others

Total

Rate of revision in total

Femoral

Tibial

Patellar

Akagi, 2000 [19]

182

5.8

1

5

0

2

0

0

8

4.40%

0

0

0

Koshino, 2002 [20]

90

4.67

0

1

0

0

0

1

2

2.22%

0

0

3

Laskin, 2003 [21]

73

2

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1.37%

0

2

0

Bal, 2006 [22]

36

2.6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.00%

0

0

0

Majima, 2008 [23]

110

5.5

1

0

0

0

0

1

2

1.82%

0

3

0

Iida, 2012 [24]

107

5 (1–7)

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0.93%

0

0

0

Innocenti, 2014 [25]

87

11.3

0

0

2

0

0

0

2

2.30%

2

12

0

Park, 2014 [26]

84

5.16 (4.25–7.33)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

17

0

Ahmed, 2015

303

9.7 (8.3–11.6)

8 in total

2.64%

18 in total

Bergschmidt, 2015 [27]

109

4.08

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0.92%

4

9

0

Bergschmidt, 2016 [28]

21

5

0

1

0

1

0

0

2

9.52%

2

4

0

Meier, 2016 [29]

32

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.00%

1

5

0

Nakamura, 2017 [30]

37

11.8

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

2.70%

13

17

0

Nakamura, 2017 [30]

167

18.1

1

9

3

4

3

4

24

14.37%

44

3

0

Grand total

1438

 

3

16

5

7

3

10

52

3.62%

67

72

3

  1. Duration of follow-up was presented as a mean value with range in the brackets