Clinical results and complications following surgical management of symptomatic os acromiale: a systematic review

Table 2 Patient-reported outcome scores stratified by surgical category

Surgical technique	No. of patients	No. of shoulders	Patient-reported outcome scores					Subjective scores
Surgical technique	No. of patients	No. of shoulders	Score	No. of patients^†	Preop*	Postop*	Change^ǂ	Good or excellent (%)
Excision	71	77	ASES	31	43.3	92.1	48.8
			Constant pain component	11	3.9	12.9	9.0
			Constant total	11	NR	72.6	---	92% (59 of 64 responses)
			UCLA	14	16.8	31.3	14.5
			PSS	6	50.6	78.5	27.9
			QuickDASH	6	NR	15.9	---
Acromioplasty	18	18	Constant pain component	18	4.5	12.5	8.0	63% (10 of 16 responses)
			Constant total	18	NR	73.9	---
ORIF	121	126	ASES	6	38.8	93.1	54.3
			Constant pain component	22	4.5	13.1	8.6
			Constant total	45	52.5	76.1	23.6
			UCLA	4	19	35	16
			DASH	5	NR	37.3	---	82% (54 of 66 responses)
			QuickDASH	10	NR	20.6	---

ORIF open reduction and internal fixation, Preop preoperative, Postop postoperative, ASES American Shoulder and Elbow Society, UCLA University of California Los Angeles, DASH Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand, PSS Penn shoulder score, “---” change score not calculated
^†Number of patients that completed patient-reported outcome scores within each category of surgical treatment
*The values are given as weighted means
^ǂPostoperative score minus preoperative score

ISSN: 1749-799X