Skip to main content

Table 1 The general characteristic of the included studies

From: Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis

Reference

Country

Mean age (years)

Sample size

Study type

Follow-up

O-TLIF

MI-TLIF

Singh et al. [11]

USA

51.67/49.85

33/33

RCTs

6 months

Midline incision

Unilateral approach

Kulkarni et al. [12]

India

51.55/50.40

36/25

RCTs

36.5 months

Posterior midline incision

Unilateral approach

Lee et al. [13]

Singapore

56.6/ 56.8

40/40

RCTs

24 months

NS

NS

Seng et al. [14]

Singapore

52.2/56.6

72/72

RCTs

60 months

Midline incision

Parasagittal incision

Serban et al. [15]

USA

51.3/ 50.1

24/23

RCTs

6 months

Midline skin

Parasagittal incision

Wang et al. [16]

China

56.4/ 54.2

42/39

RCTs

36.1 months

Midline open approach

NS

Wang et al. [17]

China

47.9/53.2

42/43

RCTs

26.3 months

Midline open approach

Unilateral approach

  1. RCTs, randomized controlled trials, MI-TLIF, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, O-TLIF, open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, NS not stated