Skip to main content

Table 2 Outcomes of the 14 including articles

From: Effects of bisphosphonates in preventing periprosthetic bone loss following total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study (author/year)

BMD (mean ± SD) (g/cm2)

BAP (mean ± SD) (U/L) (BPs vs. control)

NTX-I (mean ± SD) (nmol/mmol Cr) (BPs vs. control)

1 year (BPs vs. control)

2–4 years (BPs vs. control)

≥ 5 years (BPs vs. control)

Tapaninen TS/2010 [18]

− 0.04 ± 0.09 vs. − 0.12 ± 0.10

− 0.05 ± 0.12 vs. − 0.18 ± 0.21

− 0.06 ± 0.12 vs. − 0.16 ± 0.24

NA

NA

Trevisan C/2010 [19]

− 0.04 ± 0.07 vs. − 0.07 ± 0.08

NA

NA

NA

NA

Arabmotlagh M/2009 [20]

− 0.02 ± 0.16 vs. − 0.04 ± 0.09

NA

− 0.02 ± 0.17 vs. − 0.06 ± 0.20

NA

NA

Yamasaki S/2007 [21]

NA

NA

NA

21.5 ± 7.7 vs. 31.2 ± 9.6

39.2 ± 15.9 vs.70.3 ± 27.7

Fokter SK/2006 [22]

− 0.06 ± 0.07 vs. − 0.06 ± 0.23

NA

NA

NA

NA

Arabmotlagh M/2006 [23]

0 ± 0.16 vs. − 0.07 ± 0.22

NA

NA

17.9 ± 6 vs. 27.1 ± 8.9

NA

Yamaguchi K/2004 [24]

− 0.06 ± 0.12 vs. − 0.12 ± 0.14

− 0.09 ± 0.13 vs. − 0.13 ± 0.13

NA

25.2 ± 6.6 vs. 29.6 ± 8.7

52.5 ± 29.2 vs. 71.3 ± 17.8

Iwamoto N/2011 [25]

0 ± 0.12 vs. − 0.08 ± 0.14

NA

NA

NA

NA

Kinov P/2006 [26]

NA

NA

NA

19.93 ± 6.6 vs. 26.9 ± 5.9

NA

Shetty N/2006 [27]

− 0.01 ± 0.07 vs. − 0.02 ± 0.14

− 0.02 ± 0.05 vs. − 0.01 ± 0.16

− 0.02 ± 0.01 vs. − 0.03 ± 0.2

NA

NA

Scott DF/2013 [28]

0.80 ± 10.4 vs. − 6.03 ± 13.2

− 0.16 ± 14.0 vs. − 7.13 ± 12.7

NA

NA

NA

Yukizawa Y/2017 [29]

− 0.04 ± 0.02 vs. − 0.13 ± 0.02

NA

− 0.12 ± 0.03 vs. − 0.21 ± 0.02

NA

NA

Muren O/2015 [30]

NA

− 0.19 ± 0.02 vs. − 0.22 ± 0.03

NA

NA

NA

Nehme A/2003 [31]

− 0.24 ± 0.07 vs. − 0.32 ± 0.07

− 0.09 ± 0.06 vs. − 0.16 ± 0.06

NA

NA

NA

  1. BPs bisphosphonates, BMD bone mineral density, BAP serum bone alkaline phosphates, NTX-I urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen, NA not applicable