Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of information of the prospective studies and retrospective studies

From: Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar discherniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Low-back pain

Leg pain

ODI

Recurrence

Hospital stay

Complications

Average duration of surgery (min)

Hermantin et al. [20]

–

1.2 vs. 1.9

–

–

–

0 vs. 0

–

Mayer and Brock [21]

10/19 vs. 15/20

8.23 ± 1.3 vs. 7.67 ± 1.9

–

1/20 vs. 0/20

–

–

40.7 ± 11.3 vs. 58.2 ± 15.2

Ruetten et al. [10]

–

–

–

3 vs. 5

–

0 vs. 4

–

Gibson et al. [22]

2.50 ± 2.5 vs. 3.0 ± 2.8

1.9 ± 2.6 vs. 3.5 ± 3.1

18 ± 17 vs. 22 ± 20

5 vs. 2

0.7 ± 0.7 vs. 1.4 ± 1.3 days

0 vs. 0

28 ± 11 vs. 29 ± 12

Mehmet [27]

–

–

–

–

1.13 vs. 1.2 days

–

94 vs. 71

Kim et al. [23]

–

–

–

28/295 vs. 38/607

–

0 vs. 1

–

Lee et al. [24]

–

–

–

1 vs. 0

19.5 ± 30.12 vs. 71.9 ± 60.05 h

–

42.6 ± 14.21 vs. 65.1 ± 23.17

Ahn et al. [25]

2.50 ± 0.62 vs. 2.91 ± 0.67

2.06 ± 0.84 vs. 2.32 ± 1.01

9.63 ± 2.31 vs. 10.68 ± 2.67

1 vs. 1

7.50 ± 2.63 vs. 15.65 ± 4.80 h

4 vs. 4

48.66 ± 6.45 vs. 53.71 ± 8.49

Hsu et al. [26]

 

1.56 ± 2.18 vs. 1.29 ± 1.84

6.42 ± 9.82 vs. 3.29 ± 6.94

6 vs. 4

 

1 vs. 1

86.5 ± 45.9 vs. 48.1 ± 9.2