Table 2 Literature review
From: Do small changes in rotation affect measurements of lower extremity limb alignment?
Reference | Number of normal subjects | Mean age | Gender | Technique | aLDFA | mLDFA | MPTA | AMA | mTFA | JLCA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Present study | 87 patients undergoing CT angiography | N/A | 49M, 38F | 3D CT reconstructions with computer assisted analysis | 80.24 ± 2.16° | 85.59 ± 2.26° | 86.09 ± 2.77° | 5.35 ± 0.68° | −0.71 ± 3.07° | −1.21 ± 1.73° |
3 | 119 healthy volunteers | 38 | 52M, 67F | Standard full length radiographs | N/A | 86.04–2.33° | 86.92 ± 2.33° | N/A | −0.97 ± 2.86° | −1.85 ± 1.61° |
15 | 25 male volunteers | 30 | 25M, 0F | Standard full length radiographs | N/A | N/A | 87.2° | 4.05° | −1.3°(varus) | N/A |
18 | 50 healthy Chinese adult volunteers | 23-year-old females, 24-year-old males | 25M, 25F | Standard full length radiographs | N/A | N/A | 85.1 (males), 84.6 (females) | 3.6 males, 3.1 females | −2.2 (males and females) | N/A |
17 | 120 healthy Caucasian adult volunteers | range 25–60 | 60M, 60F | Standard full length radiographs | N/A | 88.13° | 86.85° | 4.9 ± 0.7° | −1.2 ± 2.2° | N/A |
20 | 100 healthy Iranian adult volunteers | range 15–32 | 50M, 50F | Standard full length radiographs | 83.2 ± 3° | N/A | 87.2 | 5.7 ± 1.2° | −1.5°(varus) | −1 ± 1.6° |
21 | 118 healthy female Korean volunteers | range 20–39 | 118F | Standard full length radiographs | N/A | 87.78 ± 1.68° | 86.82 ± 1.61° | 5.99 ± 0.7° | −1.35 ± 2.04° | N/A |