Skip to main content

Table 3 Changes in revascularization, inflammation, fiber structure, and hyaline degeneration scores and number of fibroblasts throughout the experiment for each study group

From: The effect of erythropoietin on biomechanical properties of the Achilles tendon during the healing process: an experimental study

 

Week 1

Week 2

Week 3

Week 4

p a

Revascularization score

     

 Erythropoietin group

3 (3–3)

1 (1–1)

0 (0–0)

0 (0–0)

0.012

 Control group

2 (1–2.5)

0.5 (0–0.5)

0 (0–0)

0 (0–0)

0.035b

P for intergroup difference

0.100

0.100

1.000

1.000

 

Inflammation score

     

 Erythropoietin group

2 (2–3)

1 (0–1)

1 (0–1)

0 (0–1)

0.061

 Control group

3 (2–3)

1 (0–1)

0 (0–1)

0.5 (0–1)

0.075

P for intergroup difference

0.700

1.000

0.700

0.800

 

Fiber structure score

     

 Erythropoietin group

1 (0–1)

1 (1–1)

2 (2–2)

3 (3–3)

0.015

 Control group

1 (1–1)

2 (2–2)

3 (3–3)

3 (3–3)

0.019

P for intergroup difference

0.700

0.100

0.100

1.000

 

Hyaline degeneration score

     

 Erythropoietin group

0 (0–0)

1 (0–1)

1 (1–3)

2 (1–3)

0.051

 Control group

0 (0–0)

1 (1–2)

3 (1–3)

2.5 (2–3)

0.053

P for intergroup difference

1.000

0.400

0.700

0.800

 

Number of fibroblasts

     

 Erythropoietin group

22 (8–28)

40 (32–47)

54 (40–54)

27 (12–30)

0.030b

 Control group

20 (16–33)

45 (27–52)

44 (30–45)

32 (30–35)

0.272

P for intergroup difference

1.000

1.000

0.400

0.200

 
  1. Data are presented as median (range)
  2. aOverall p value for differences between four time points
  3. bDespite statistical significance for overall difference, post hoc analysis did not identify a significantly different time point
  4. Raw data is provided in Additional file 2