Skip to main content

Table 4 Immunohistochemical analysis on the tibia articular cartilages

From: Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma synergistically ameliorate the surgical-induced osteoarthritis in Beagle dogs

Cell numbers (cells/mm2)

Sham

Control

MSC

PRP

MP

BrdU+

123.67ā€‰Ā±ā€‰24.40

7.00ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.97h

49.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰12.69hj

62.00ā€‰Ā±ā€‰16.09hj

120.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰29.27jkl

IL-1Ī²+

5.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.16

170.67ā€‰Ā±ā€‰19.94a

63.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰11.64ac

41.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰16.10ac

15.67ā€‰Ā±ā€‰10.25cdf

TNF-Ī±+

6.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.14

141.00ā€‰Ā±ā€‰32.51a

70.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰14.17ac

53.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰15.24ac

28.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰10.45bcdg

COX-2+

4.00ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.61

129.67ā€‰Ā±ā€‰44.74h

61.67ā€‰Ā±ā€‰13.76hj

37.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰11.04hj

18.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.93hjkl

iNOS+

41.17ā€‰Ā±ā€‰17.88

243.00ā€‰Ā±ā€‰54.32h

124.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰45.37hj

73.00ā€‰Ā±ā€‰10.97ij

47.60ā€‰Ā±ā€‰13.17ikl

Caspase-3+

6.00ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.85

102.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰27.06h

43.17ā€‰Ā±ā€‰12.48hj

25.83ā€‰Ā±ā€‰5.53hj

15.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰4.63hjk

PARP+

45.67ā€‰Ā±ā€‰10.63

134.67ā€‰Ā±ā€‰38.53a

68.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰17.49c

63.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰19.03c

39.67ā€‰Ā±ā€‰12.36ceg

IFN-Ī³+

7.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.43

49.67ā€‰Ā±ā€‰11.40h

28.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰5.79hj

22.33ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.27hj

13.83ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.82jkl

  1. Values are expressed as meanā€‰Ā±ā€‰SD of six dogs
  2. MSC mesenchymal stem cells, PRP platelet-rich plasma, MP MSC and PRP co-treatment
  3. a pā€‰<ā€‰0.01 as compared with sham control by LSD test
  4. b pā€‰<ā€‰0.05 as compared with sham control by LSD test
  5. c pā€‰<ā€‰0.01 as compared with control by LSD test
  6. d pā€‰<ā€‰0.01 as compared with MSC treated group by LSD test
  7. e pā€‰<ā€‰0.05 as compared with MSC treated group by LSD test
  8. f pā€‰<ā€‰0.01 as compared with PRP treated group by LSD test
  9. g pā€‰<ā€‰0.05 as compared with PRP treated group by LSD test
  10. h pā€‰<ā€‰0.01 as compared with sham control by MW test
  11. i pā€‰<ā€‰0.05 as compared with sham control by MW test
  12. j pā€‰<ā€‰0.01 as compared with control by MW test
  13. k pā€‰<ā€‰0.01 as compared with MSC treated group by MW test
  14. l pā€‰<ā€‰0.01 as compared with PRP treated group by MW test