Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics by implant type

From: Does bearing size influence metal ion levels in large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty? A comparison of three total hip systems

 

Durom

Birmingham

Pinnacle

p valuea

Age in years (mean ± SD)

61.7 ± 5.9

60.4 ± 11.3

56.5 ± 9.2

0.2251

Female sex

31.6%

73.7%

93.8%

0.0003

(6/19)

(14/19)

(15/16)

BMI (mean ± SD)

30.2 ± 7.1

30.7 ± 7.4

28.4 ± 4.3

0.5559

Diabetes

5.3%

5.3%

0.0%

1.0000

(1/19)

(1/19)

(0/16)

Smoking

15.8%

21.1%

12.5%

0.9011

(3/19)

(4/19)

(2/16)

SF-36 (mean ± SD)

85.6 ± 12.0

84.1 ± 12.5

79.6 ± 18.7

0.4639

Harris hip score (mean ± SD)

80.0 ± 15.9

76.4 ± 15.3

78.1 ± 16.9

0.7832

UCLA activity scale (mean ± SD)

6.5 ± 1.7

7.1 ± 1.7

7.1 ± 1.3

0.4456

WOMAC score (mean ± SD)

84.3 ± 11.8

82.2 ± 13.7

80.7 ± 13.2

0.7122

Cobalt (μg/l) median (25th, 75th percentile)

2.8

3.3

0.5

<0.001

(1.5,3.6)

(1.4,4.1)

(0.4,0.7)

Chromium (μg/l) median (25th, 75th percentile)

2.0

2.2

1.2

<0.001

(1.5,2.5)

(1.5,2.7)

(1.0,1.4)

Head size (mm) median (25th, 75th percentile)

48.0

48.0

40.0

<0.0001

(44.0,50.0)

(44.0,54.0)

(40.0,40.0)

  1. ap value (Pinnacle vs Durom and Birmingham implants).